On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:09:46PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
Following from my previous RFC about transaction memory attributes,
here's some code I think is good enough to drop the 'RFC' tag :-)
(read: I would like to land this when master reopens for 2.4.)
I've included both the changes
Following from my previous RFC about transaction memory attributes,
here's some code I think is good enough to drop the 'RFC' tag :-)
(read: I would like to land this when master reopens for 2.4.)
I've included both the changes to the core memory system code
and the target-arm changes as a usage
