Il 25/10/2013 05:38, Lei Li ha scritto:
Just want to confirm, normally, should I take these 'otherwise looks
good/ok'
as a 'Reviewed-by' from you If the other comment is fixed in the update
version?
Depends on how much the patch changes... right now I'm still expecting
some changes so I
On 10/25/2013 03:23 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 25/10/2013 05:38, Lei Li ha scritto:
Just want to confirm, normally, should I take these 'otherwise looks
good/ok'
as a 'Reviewed-by' from you If the other comment is fixed in the update
version?
Depends on how much the patch changes... right now
Il 22/10/2013 04:25, Lei Li ha scritto:
Override befor_ram_iterate to send pipefd. It will write the
RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK flags which will trigger the load hook to
receive it.
Signed-off-by: Lei Li li...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
migration-local.c | 26 ++
1 files
On 10/24/2013 10:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/10/2013 04:25, Lei Li ha scritto:
Override befor_ram_iterate to send pipefd. It will write the
RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK flags which will trigger the load hook to
receive it.
Signed-off-by: Lei Li li...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
migration-local.c |
On 10/24/2013 10:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/10/2013 04:25, Lei Li ha scritto:
Override befor_ram_iterate to send pipefd. It will write the
RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK flags which will trigger the load hook to
receive it.
Signed-off-by: Lei Li li...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
migration-local.c |
Override befor_ram_iterate to send pipefd. It will write the
RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK flags which will trigger the load hook to
receive it.
Signed-off-by: Lei Li li...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
migration-local.c | 26 ++
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
