On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:13:34PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> I have added it to my TODO-list. :-)
Cool, thanks. Let me know if I can test stuff and help out somehow.
> >
> > Also, there's another aspect, while we're here: now that QEMU emulates
> > MOVBE with TCG too, how do we specify on
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:49:04PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:21:34AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > The problem here is that "requested_features" doesn't include just
> > the explicit "+flag" flags, but any flag included in the CPU model
> > definition. See the "
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:21:34AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> The problem here is that "requested_features" doesn't include just
> the explicit "+flag" flags, but any flag included in the CPU model
> definition. See the "-cpu n270" example below.
Oh, you mean if requested_features would conta
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:32:06PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 04:20:59PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Please point me to the code that does this, because I don't see it on
> > patch 6/6.
>
> @@ -1850,7 +1850,14 @@ static void filter_features_for_kvm(X86CPU *cpu)
>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 04:20:59PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Please point me to the code that does this, because I don't see it on
> patch 6/6.
@@ -1850,7 +1850,14 @@ static void filter_features_for_kvm(X86CPU *cpu)
wi->cpuid_ecx,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 08:55:24PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:19:15AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Then we may have a problem: some CPU models already have "movbe"
> > included (e.g. Haswell), and patch 6/6 will make "-cpu Haswell" get
> > movbe enabled even if
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:19:15AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Then we may have a problem: some CPU models already have "movbe"
> included (e.g. Haswell), and patch 6/6 will make "-cpu Haswell" get
> movbe enabled even if it is being emulated.
Huh? HSW has MOVBE so we won't #UD on it and MOVBE
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:04:14PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:57:00AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, September 23, 2013 6:28 pm, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 04:44:50PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > >> From: Borislav Petkov
> > >>
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:57:00AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, September 23, 2013 6:28 pm, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 04:44:50PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> From: Borislav Petkov
> >>
> >> Add a kvm ioctl which states which system functionality kvm emulat
On Mon, September 23, 2013 6:28 pm, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 04:44:50PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> From: Borislav Petkov
>>
>> Add a kvm ioctl which states which system functionality kvm emulates.
>> The format used is that of CPUID and we return the corresponding CPU
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 04:44:50PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> Add a kvm ioctl which states which system functionality kvm emulates.
> The format used is that of CPUID and we return the corresponding CPUID
> bits set for which we do emulate functionality.
Let me che
11 matches
Mail list logo
