Il 02/06/2013 18:04, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 2 June 2013 16:43, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
-int qemu_ram_addr_from_host(void *ptr, ram_addr_t *ram_addr);
+MemoryRegion *qemu_ram_addr_from_host(void *ptr, ram_addr_t *ram_addr);
ram_addr_t qemu_ram_addr_from_host_nofail(void
Il 03/06/2013 08:40, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
Il 02/06/2013 18:04, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 2 June 2013 16:43, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
-int qemu_ram_addr_from_host(void *ptr, ram_addr_t *ram_addr);
+MemoryRegion *qemu_ram_addr_from_host(void *ptr, ram_addr_t *ram_addr);
It will be needed in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
---
exec.c| 35 +--
include/exec/cpu-common.h | 2 +-
target-i386/kvm.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 2 June 2013 16:43, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
-int qemu_ram_addr_from_host(void *ptr, ram_addr_t *ram_addr);
+MemoryRegion *qemu_ram_addr_from_host(void *ptr, ram_addr_t *ram_addr);
ram_addr_t qemu_ram_addr_from_host_nofail(void *ptr);
This is weird, because now the _nofail
