On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:30:13AM +0200, Ladi Prosek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 05:20:48PM +0200, Ladi Prosek wrote:
> >> From: Stefan Hajnoczi
> >>
> >> virtqueue_discard() requires a
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 05:20:48PM +0200, Ladi Prosek wrote:
>> From: Stefan Hajnoczi
>>
>> virtqueue_discard() requires a VirtQueueElement but virtio-balloon does
>> not migrate its in-use element.
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 05:20:48PM +0200, Ladi Prosek wrote:
> From: Stefan Hajnoczi
>
> virtqueue_discard() requires a VirtQueueElement but virtio-balloon does
> not migrate its in-use element. Introduce a new function that is
> similar to virtqueue_discard() but doesn't
From: Stefan Hajnoczi
virtqueue_discard() requires a VirtQueueElement but virtio-balloon does
not migrate its in-use element. Introduce a new function that is
similar to virtqueue_discard() but doesn't require a VirtQueueElement.
This will allow virtio-balloon to access