On 11/19/18 4:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Simply setting the 'quit' flag after sending NBD_CMD_DISC is enough to
get the coroutine to stop waiting for a reply and thus supress the error
message.
Actually, it's not quite enough - once you actually start performing I/O,
enough coroutines
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 08:19:10PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/16/18 9:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > When sending a NBD_CMD_DISC message there is no reply expected,
> > however, the nbd_read_eof() coroutine is still waiting for a reply.
> > In a plain NBD connection this doesn't matter
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 08:19:10PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/16/18 9:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > When sending a NBD_CMD_DISC message there is no reply expected,
> > however, the nbd_read_eof() coroutine is still waiting for a reply.
> > In a plain NBD connection this doesn't matter
On 11/16/18 9:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
When sending a NBD_CMD_DISC message there is no reply expected,
however, the nbd_read_eof() coroutine is still waiting for a reply.
In a plain NBD connection this doesn't matter as it will just get an
EOF, however, on a TLS connection it will get an
On 11/16/18 9:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
When sending a NBD_CMD_DISC message there is no reply expected,
however, the nbd_read_eof() coroutine is still waiting for a reply.
In a plain NBD connection this doesn't matter as it will just get an
EOF, however, on a TLS connection it will get an
When sending a NBD_CMD_DISC message there is no reply expected,
however, the nbd_read_eof() coroutine is still waiting for a reply.
In a plain NBD connection this doesn't matter as it will just get an
EOF, however, on a TLS connection it will get an interrupted TLS data
packet. The nbd_read_eof()
