On 4/29/19 7:28 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 05:05, Richard Henderson
> wrote:
>>
>> We can now use the CPUClass hook instead of a named function.
>>
>> Create a static tlb_fill function to avoid other changes within
>> cputlb.c. This also which also isolates the asserts
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 05:05, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> We can now use the CPUClass hook instead of a named function.
>
> Create a static tlb_fill function to avoid other changes within
> cputlb.c. This also which also isolates the asserts implied.
I'm not sure what this sentence is trying to
We can now use the CPUClass hook instead of a named function.
Create a static tlb_fill function to avoid other changes within
cputlb.c. This also which also isolates the asserts implied.
Remove the named tlb_fill function from all of the targets.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
