On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 20:45 -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
So, I think the question isn't what does real-hardware do (there's no
gain to be had in emulating all of this). Instead, I think the
question is - what makes the most sense.
Well,... what we implement for the 'native SeaBIOS on
Resuming from suspend-to-RAM should not reset all devices. Only the CPU
should get a reset signal.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
---
vl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
index c03edf1..2c93478 100644
--- a/vl.c
+++ b/vl.c
@@
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:03 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Resuming from suspend-to-RAM should not reset all devices. Only the
CPU should get a reset signal.
Hm... on reflection, I don't actually know if this is true.
Perhaps we *should* reset all devices. After all, in a real machine
they'll
Il 05/03/2013 17:59, David Woodhouse ha scritto:
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:03 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Resuming from suspend-to-RAM should not reset all devices. Only the
CPU should get a reset signal.
Hm... on reflection, I don't actually know if this is true.
Perhaps we *should*
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
That is: perhaps it's a *SeaBIOS* bug that suspend/resume doesn't
work if the PAM configuration is reset?
Yeah, it sounded a bit weird when I wrote that commit message.
This could be the case. How does it work on Coreboot?
Yes all hardware except RAM in self-refresh
Il 05/03/2013 18:26, Peter Stuge ha scritto:
That is: perhaps it's a *SeaBIOS* bug that suspend/resume doesn't
work if the PAM configuration is reset?
Yeah, it sounded a bit weird when I wrote that commit message.
This could be the case. How does it work on Coreboot?
Yes all
On 03/05/13 17:59, David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:03 +0100,
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Resuming from suspend-to-RAM should not reset all devices. Only the
CPU should get a reset signal.
Hm... on reflection, I don't actually know if this is true.
Perhaps we *should* reset all
Il 05/03/2013 20:12, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
On 03/05/13 17:59, David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:03 +0100,
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Resuming from suspend-to-RAM should not reset all devices. Only the
CPU should get a reset signal.
Hm... on reflection, I don't actually know if
On 03/05/13 20:25, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 05/03/2013 20:12, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
On 03/05/13 17:59, David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:03
+0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Resuming from suspend-to-RAM should not reset all devices. Only the
CPU should get a reset signal.
Hm...
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:59:51PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:03 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Resuming from suspend-to-RAM should not reset all devices. Only the
CPU should get a reset signal.
Hm... on reflection, I don't actually know if this is true.
10 matches
Mail list logo
