On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
It is never used, since ISA device are not hot-unpluggable.
Is it not good design practice though for the uninit to be correctly
implemented regardless of whether there is current-day usage? This
seems like the kind of
Il 31/07/2014 14:00, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
It is never used, since ISA device are not hot-unpluggable.
Is it not good design practice though for the uninit to be correctly
implemented regardless of whether
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 31/07/2014 14:00, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
It is never used, since ISA device are not hot-unpluggable.
Is it not good design practice
It is never used, since ISA device are not hot-unpluggable.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
---
hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c
index d398c16..82747ee 100644
--- a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c
+++