On 31.07.2014 10:06, Benoît Canet wrote:
The Saturday 26 Jul 2014 à 21:22:08 (+0200), Max Reitz wrote :
The only really time-consuming operation potentially performed by
qcow2_amend_options() is zero cluster expansion when downgrading qcow2
images from compat=1.1 to compat=0.10, so report
On 08/01/2014 02:18 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
+if (status_cb) {
+status_cb(bs, *visited_l1_entries (s-l2_bits +
s-cluster_bits),
+ l1_entries (s-l2_bits + s-cluster_bits));
Shifting is a multiplication so it keep proportionality intact.
So do we really
The Saturday 26 Jul 2014 à 21:22:08 (+0200), Max Reitz wrote :
The only really time-consuming operation potentially performed by
qcow2_amend_options() is zero cluster expansion when downgrading qcow2
images from compat=1.1 to compat=0.10, so report status of that
operation and that operation
On 07/26/2014 01:22 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
The only really time-consuming operation potentially performed by
qcow2_amend_options() is zero cluster expansion when downgrading qcow2
images from compat=1.1 to compat=0.10, so report status of that
operation and that operation only through the status
The only really time-consuming operation potentially performed by
qcow2_amend_options() is zero cluster expansion when downgrading qcow2
images from compat=1.1 to compat=0.10, so report status of that
operation and that operation only through the status CB.
For this, approximate the progress as
