On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 06:41:24PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 11.06.2013 09:41, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> > Andreas Färber writes:
> >> If having patch 57/59 larger is not a concern (which getting rid of
> >> open-coded CPU loops tried to address), then I can just convert the
> >> loops
Am 11.06.2013 09:41, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> Andreas Färber writes:
>> If having patch 57/59 larger is not a concern (which getting rid of
>> open-coded CPU loops tried to address), then I can just convert the
>> loops in place alongside first_cpu / next_cpu.
>> Then still the question remain
Andreas Färber writes:
> Am 10.06.2013 09:20, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>> Andreas Färber writes:
>>
>>> Use new qemu_for_each_cpu().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
>>> ---
>>> monitor.c | 27 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> dif
Am 10.06.2013 09:20, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> Andreas Färber writes:
>
>> Use new qemu_for_each_cpu().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
>> ---
>> monitor.c | 27 +++
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
>> in
Andreas Färber writes:
> Use new qemu_for_each_cpu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
> ---
> monitor.c | 27 +++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> index 9be515c..f37bf3d 100644
> --- a/monitor.c
> +++ b/monitor
Use new qemu_for_each_cpu().
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
---
monitor.c | 27 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
index 9be515c..f37bf3d 100644
--- a/monitor.c
+++ b/monitor.c
@@ -1803,21 +1803,32 @@ static void do_inf
