Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru writes:
11.06.2013 00:47, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Or else
./configure --disable-system --enable-virtfs
(which makes no sense by its own but does not error out)
will fail to build, because it will define CONFIG_VIRTFS,
and the makefile will try to build
On 11 June 2013 10:22, M. Mohan Kumar mo...@in.ibm.com wrote:
I tried ./configure --disable-system --enable-virtfs and make. But didnt
face any build failure. Could you please share your build failure
information? virtfs-proxy-helper.1 is created inside the fsdev folder.
Michael wrote The
11.06.2013 13:22, M. Mohan Kumar wrote:
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru writes:
11.06.2013 00:47, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Or else
./configure --disable-system --enable-virtfs
(which makes no sense by its own but does not error out)
will fail to build, because it will define
11.06.2013 01:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 10 June 2013 21:47, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
Or else
./configure --disable-system --enable-virtfs
(which makes no sense by its own but does not error out)
will fail to build, because it will define CONFIG_VIRTFS,
and the makefile
On 11 June 2013 13:29, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
11.06.2013 01:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
This doesn't feel to me like it's quite the right way
to fix this bug. The current code in configure seems
to tangle up (a) was virtfs requested and can we do it?
with (b) what do we need to
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
How about this approach?
[PATCH] configure: Disable virtfs if softmmu not enabled
Signed-off-by: M. Mohan Kumar mo...@in.ibm.com
---
configure | 11 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
11.06.2013 21:23, M. Mohan Kumar wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
How about this approach?
Well, this is definitely wrong :)
-if test $softmmu = yes ; then
- if test $virtfs != no ; then
+
+if test $virtfs != no ; then
+ if test $softmmu = yes ; then
if test
On 11 June 2013 19:19, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
FWIW, I still don't understand what Peter Maydell dislikes
in a simplest case I posted initially, where we merely ignore
(disable) virtfs in case !softmmu.
It just seems to me that rather than fixing a bug in the
makefile (it still
11.06.2013 23:21, Peter Maydell пишет:
On 11 June 2013 19:19, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
FWIW, I still don't understand what Peter Maydell dislikes
in a simplest case I posted initially, where we merely ignore
(disable) virtfs in case !softmmu.
It just seems to me that rather
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru writes:
11.06.2013 21:23, M. Mohan Kumar wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
How about this approach?
Well, this is definitely wrong :)
-if test $softmmu = yes ; then
- if test $virtfs != no ; then
+
+if test $virtfs != no ; then
+
Or else
./configure --disable-system --enable-virtfs
(which makes no sense by its own but does not error out)
will fail to build, because it will define CONFIG_VIRTFS,
and the makefile will try to build virtfs-proxy-helper
manpage (but not the executable).
Cc: qemu-triv...@nongnu.org
Cc: M.
11.06.2013 00:47, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Or else
./configure --disable-system --enable-virtfs
(which makes no sense by its own but does not error out)
will fail to build, because it will define CONFIG_VIRTFS,
and the makefile will try to build virtfs-proxy-helper
manpage (but not the
On 10 June 2013 21:47, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
Or else
./configure --disable-system --enable-virtfs
(which makes no sense by its own but does not error out)
will fail to build, because it will define CONFIG_VIRTFS,
and the makefile will try to build virtfs-proxy-helper
13 matches
Mail list logo
