On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 01:05:11 PDT (-0700), peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 15 October 2018 at 21:28, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 02:34:12 PDT (-0700), peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
The expected patch flow for QEMU is:
* original patch author posts patch to qemu-devel
On 15 October 2018 at 21:28, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 02:34:12 PDT (-0700), peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
>> The expected patch flow for QEMU is:
>> * original patch author posts patch to qemu-devel
>>(this applies also if the author happens to be the
>>
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 02:34:12 PDT (-0700), peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 11 October 2018 at 21:52, Michael Clark wrote:
Peter, I have to pull in your remote wholesale. I don't cherry-pick from
your tree. I think this is truly dumb. This might serve the needs of some
folk running Linux but
On 11 October 2018 at 21:52, Michael Clark wrote:
> Peter, I have to pull in your remote wholesale. I don't cherry-pick from
> your tree. I think this is truly dumb. This might serve the needs of some
> folk running Linux but we have emulation fidelity fixes for the RISC-V
> community as a whole.
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 02:34:16 PDT (-0700), peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 10 October 2018 at 19:22, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:10:07 PDT (-0700), peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 10 October 2018 at 18:49, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
we should really
get the ball rolling
Hi All,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 7:22 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:10:07 PDT (-0700), peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
> > On 10 October 2018 at 18:49, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >> we should really
> >> get the ball rolling on our big patch backlog.
> >
> > Yes, please do.
On 10 October 2018 at 19:22, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:10:07 PDT (-0700), peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
>>
>> On 10 October 2018 at 18:49, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>
>>> we should really
>>> get the ball rolling on our big patch backlog.
>>
>>
>> Yes, please do. Softfreeze
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:10:07 PDT (-0700), peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 10 October 2018 at 18:49, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
we should really
get the ball rolling on our big patch backlog.
Yes, please do. Softfreeze is not all that far away and I
would strongly prefer not to get an enormous
On 10/10/2018 11:10 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 10 October 2018 at 18:49, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
we should really
get the ball rolling on our big patch backlog.
Yes, please do. Softfreeze is not all that far away and I
would strongly prefer not to get an enormous sized pull
request at the
On 10 October 2018 at 18:49, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> we should really
> get the ball rolling on our big patch backlog.
Yes, please do. Softfreeze is not all that far away and I
would strongly prefer not to get an enormous sized pull
request at the last minute. The ideal pattern is that
code
On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 11:25:07 PDT (-0700), alistair.fran...@wdc.com wrote:
These are some patches that I have cherry picked from Michael's RISC-V
tree that are ready to be applied.
Unless anyone has any comments against these I'll send a PR later this
week.
Michael Clark (5):
RISC-V: Allow
These are some patches that I have cherry picked from Michael's RISC-V
tree that are ready to be applied.
Unless anyone has any comments against these I'll send a PR later this
week.
Michael Clark (5):
RISC-V: Allow setting and clearing multiple irqs
RISC-V: Move non-ops from op_helper to
12 matches
Mail list logo
