On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Alistair Francis
wrote:
> Use the new object_initialize_child() and sysbus_init_child_obj() to
> fix the issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis
>
Reviewed-by: Michael Clark
> ---
> hw/riscv/sifive_e.c | 12 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c
> index 8a8dbe1c00..4577d72037 100644
> --- a/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c
> +++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c
> @@ -105,9 +105,9 @@ static void riscv_sifive_e_init(MachineState *machine)
> int i;
>
> /* Initialize SoC */
> -object_initialize(>soc, sizeof(s->soc), TYPE_RISCV_E_SOC);
> -object_property_add_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc", OBJECT(>soc),
> - _abort);
> +object_initialize_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc", >soc,
> +sizeof(s->soc), TYPE_RISCV_E_SOC,
> +_abort, NULL);
> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(>soc), true, "realized",
> _abort);
>
> @@ -139,9 +139,9 @@ static void riscv_sifive_e_soc_init(Object *obj)
> {
> SiFiveESoCState *s = RISCV_E_SOC(obj);
>
> -object_initialize(>cpus, sizeof(s->cpus), TYPE_RISCV_HART_ARRAY);
> -object_property_add_child(obj, "cpus", OBJECT(>cpus),
> - _abort);
> +object_initialize_child(obj, "cpus", >cpus,
> +sizeof(s->cpus), TYPE_RISCV_HART_ARRAY,
> +_abort, NULL);
> object_property_set_str(OBJECT(>cpus), SIFIVE_E_CPU, "cpu-type",
> _abort);
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(>cpus), smp_cpus, "num-harts",
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>