On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Michael Clark wrote:
> A missing shift made updates to the low order bits
> of timecmp erroneously copy the old low order bits
> into the high order bits of the 64-bit timecmp
> register. Add the missing shift and rename timecmp
> local variables to timecmp_hi and
A missing shift made updates to the low order bits
of timecmp erroneously copy the old low order bits
into the high order bits of the 64-bit timecmp
register. Add the missing shift and rename timecmp
local variables to timecmp_hi and timecmp_lo.
This bug didn't show up as the low order bits are
us