On 25/10/2016 16:48, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> And how about the rest of the things that are going on in
> bdrv_drain_all_begin()?
>
> bdrv_parent_drained_begin(bs);
No BlockBackend yet, and BlockDriverStates have been quiesced already,
so that's okay.
> bdrv_io_unplugged_begin(b
Am 25.10.2016 um 16:41 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
>
>
> On 25/10/2016 16:38, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 25.10.2016 um 15:53 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 25/10/2016 15:39, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> >>> On Mon 24 Oct 2016 12:53:41 PM CEST, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>>
> > My f
On Tue 25 Oct 2016 04:38:27 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> >>> My first thoughts were about how to let an unpause succeed without a
>> >>> previous pause for these objects, but actually I think this isn't
>> >>> what we should do. We rather want to actually do the pause instead
>> >>> because even
Am 25.10.2016 um 15:53 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
>
>
> On 25/10/2016 15:39, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> > On Mon 24 Oct 2016 12:53:41 PM CEST, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >>> My first thoughts were about how to let an unpause succeed without a
> >>> previous pause for these objects, but actually
On 25/10/2016 16:38, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 25.10.2016 um 15:53 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> On 25/10/2016 15:39, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>>> On Mon 24 Oct 2016 12:53:41 PM CEST, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
> My first thoughts were about how to let an unpause succeed without a
> pre
On 25/10/2016 15:39, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Mon 24 Oct 2016 12:53:41 PM CEST, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>>> My first thoughts were about how to let an unpause succeed without a
>>> previous pause for these objects, but actually I think this isn't
>>> what we should do. We rather want to actuall
On Mon 24 Oct 2016 12:53:41 PM CEST, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> My first thoughts were about how to let an unpause succeed without a
>> previous pause for these objects, but actually I think this isn't
>> what we should do. We rather want to actually do the pause instead
>> because even new BDSes and
On 19/10/2016 19:11, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 14.10.2016 um 15:08 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
>> bdrv_drain_all() doesn't allow the caller to do anything after all
>> pending requests have been completed but before block jobs are
>> resumed.
>>
>> This patch splits bdrv_drain_all() into _begin(
On 10/21/2016 03:03 PM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Fri 21 Oct 2016 08:55:51 PM CEST, John Snow wrote:
bdrv_drain_all() doesn't allow the caller to do anything after all
pending requests have been completed but before block jobs are
resumed.
This patch splits bdrv_drain_all() into _begin() and
On Fri 21 Oct 2016 08:55:51 PM CEST, John Snow wrote:
bdrv_drain_all() doesn't allow the caller to do anything after all
pending requests have been completed but before block jobs are
resumed.
This patch splits bdrv_drain_all() into _begin() and _end() for
that purpo
On 10/20/2016 04:25 AM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Wed 19 Oct 2016 07:11:20 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
bdrv_drain_all() doesn't allow the caller to do anything after all
pending requests have been completed but before block jobs are
resumed.
This patch splits bdrv_drain_all() into _begin() and
Am 20.10.2016 um 10:25 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> On Wed 19 Oct 2016 07:11:20 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> bdrv_drain_all() doesn't allow the caller to do anything after all
> >> pending requests have been completed but before block jobs are
> >> resumed.
> >>
> >> This patch splits bdrv
On Wed 19 Oct 2016 07:11:20 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> bdrv_drain_all() doesn't allow the caller to do anything after all
>> pending requests have been completed but before block jobs are
>> resumed.
>>
>> This patch splits bdrv_drain_all() into _begin() and _end() for that
>> purpose. It also
Am 14.10.2016 um 15:08 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> bdrv_drain_all() doesn't allow the caller to do anything after all
> pending requests have been completed but before block jobs are
> resumed.
>
> This patch splits bdrv_drain_all() into _begin() and _end() for that
> purpose. It also adds a
On 14/10/2016 15:08, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> bdrv_drain_all() doesn't allow the caller to do anything after all
> pending requests have been completed but before block jobs are
> resumed.
>
> This patch splits bdrv_drain_all() into _begin() and _end() for that
> purpose. It also adds aio_{disabl
bdrv_drain_all() doesn't allow the caller to do anything after all
pending requests have been completed but before block jobs are
resumed.
This patch splits bdrv_drain_all() into _begin() and _end() for that
purpose. It also adds aio_{disable,enable}_external() calls to disable
external clients in
16 matches
Mail list logo
