On 05.05.2017 23:06, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/05/2017 03:58 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 04.05.2017 05:07, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Although _filter_qemu_img_map documents that it scrubs offsets, it
>>> was only doing so for human mode. Of the existing tests using the
>>> filter (97, 122, 150, 154,
On 05/05/2017 03:58 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 04.05.2017 05:07, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Although _filter_qemu_img_map documents that it scrubs offsets, it
>> was only doing so for human mode. Of the existing tests using the
>> filter (97, 122, 150, 154, 176), two of them are affected, but it
>> does
On 04.05.2017 05:07, Eric Blake wrote:
> Although _filter_qemu_img_map documents that it scrubs offsets, it
> was only doing so for human mode. Of the existing tests using the
> filter (97, 122, 150, 154, 176), two of them are affected, but it
> does not hurt the validity of the tests to not
Although _filter_qemu_img_map documents that it scrubs offsets, it
was only doing so for human mode. Of the existing tests using the
filter (97, 122, 150, 154, 176), two of them are affected, but it
does not hurt the validity of the tests to not require particular
mappings (another test, 66, uses
