> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 31 October 2017 17:53
>
> On 31 October 2017 at 01:23, Andrew Baumann
> wrote:
> >> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
> >> Hi. This is looking pretty good, but I have a few
On 31 October 2017 at 01:23, Andrew Baumann
wrote:
>> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
>> Hi. This is looking pretty good, but I have a few comments below,
>> and we're pretty much at the softfreeze date (KVM Forum last week
>> meant I didn't get
> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 31 October 2017 03:25
>
> On 20 October 2017 at 22:49, Andrew Baumann
> wrote:
> > On a successful address translation instruction, PAR is supposed to
> > contain cacheability and shareability
On 20 October 2017 at 22:49, Andrew Baumann
wrote:
> On a successful address translation instruction, PAR is supposed to
> contain cacheability and shareability attributes determined by the
> translation. We previously returned 0 for these bits (in line with the
>
On a successful address translation instruction, PAR is supposed to
contain cacheability and shareability attributes determined by the
translation. We previously returned 0 for these bits (in line with the
general strategy of ignoring caches and memory attributes), but some
guest OSes may depend