On 04.06.2013 13:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Newer architectures may only implement the getdents64 syscall, not
> getdents. Provide an implementation of getdents in terms of getdents64
> so that we can run getdents-using targets on a getdents64-only host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
> Message
On 5 June 2013 11:57, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> On 04.06.2013 13:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Newer architectures may only implement the getdents64 syscall, not
>> getdents. Provide an implementation of getdents in terms of getdents64
>> so that we can run getdents-using targets on a getdents64-only
On 04.06.2013 13:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Newer architectures may only implement the getdents64 syscall, not
> getdents. Provide an implementation of getdents in terms of getdents64
> so that we can run getdents-using targets on a getdents64-only host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
> Message
On 06/04/2013 04:12 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Newer architectures may only implement the getdents64 syscall, not
> getdents. Provide an implementation of getdents in terms of getdents64
> so that we can run getdents-using targets on a getdents64-only host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
> Mess
Newer architectures may only implement the getdents64 syscall, not
getdents. Provide an implementation of getdents in terms of getdents64
so that we can run getdents-using targets on a getdents64-only host.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
Message-id: 1370193044-24535-1-git-send-email-peter.mayd...@l
