On 22.09.2017 12:50, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:39:24PM +0300, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
Now after shrinking the qcow2 image, at the end of the image file, there might
be a tail that probably will never be used. Although it will not bring any
tangible benefit, we can cut
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:39:24PM +0300, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
> Now after shrinking the qcow2 image, at the end of the image file, there might
> be a tail that probably will never be used. Although it will not bring any
> tangible benefit, we can cut the tail if it is. Yes, it will not free up
Now after shrinking the qcow2 image, at the end of the image file, there might
be a tail that probably will never be used. Although it will not bring any
tangible benefit, we can cut the tail if it is. Yes, it will not free up disk
space, but if the blocks were be allocated sequentially and the