On 14/09/2016 03:42, Cao jin wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> patch 1 seems conflicts with upstream when I rebase(conflicts with
> 616018352, but very tiny). and patch 2 isn't in your pull request. Do
> you want me to resend these two?
No, they had bugs and Marc-André fixed them. They will be in my
Hi Paolo,
patch 1 seems conflicts with upstream when I rebase(conflicts with
616018352, but very tiny). and patch 2 isn't in your pull request. Do
you want me to resend these two?
On 08/01/2016 06:08 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 28/07/2016 11:03, Cao jin wrote:
forget to cc maintainers in
On 28/07/2016 11:03, Cao jin wrote:
> forget to cc maintainers in cover-letter..
Patches 1 and 2 look good, thanks!
> On 07/28/2016 04:54 PM, Cao jin wrote:
>> v2 changelog:
>> 1. revert the yoda-condition in patch 2 (Daniel)
>>
>> Cao jin (3):
>>util: remove the obsolete non-blocking
forget to cc maintainers in cover-letter..
On 07/28/2016 04:54 PM, Cao jin wrote:
v2 changelog:
1. revert the yoda-condition in patch 2 (Daniel)
Cao jin (3):
util: remove the obsolete non-blocking connect
util: fix some coding style issue
migration/socket: fix typo in file header
v2 changelog:
1. revert the yoda-condition in patch 2 (Daniel)
Cao jin (3):
util: remove the obsolete non-blocking connect
util: fix some coding style issue
migration/socket: fix typo in file header
include/qemu/sockets.h | 7 +-
io/channel-socket.c| 2 +-
migration/socket.c |
