On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 02:28:47PM -0700, no-re...@patchew.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
> more information:
>
> Type: series
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] block: pause block jobs for
> bdrv_drai
e'll chalk that up as "not very feasible", at least
for the moment :)
> >>
> >> On 03/16/2017 05:28 PM, no-re...@patchew.org wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
> >>>
this case, or is it
not very feasible to create one?
>
> On 03/16/2017 05:28 PM, no-re...@patchew.org wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
> > more information:
> >
> > Type: series
> > Sub
a more fool-proof automated testing method, but at the
second I'm drawing a blank.
>>
>> On 03/16/2017 05:28 PM, no-re...@patchew.org wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
>>> more information:
&
: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] block: pause block jobs for
> bdrv_drain_begin/end
> Message-id: 20170316212351.13797-1-js...@redhat.com
>
> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
> #!/bin/bash
>
> BASE=base
> n=1
> total=$(git log --oneline $BASE.. | wc -l)
> failed=0
>
> #
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] block: pause block jobs for
bdrv_drain_begin/end
Message-id: 20170316212351.13797-1-js...@redhat.com
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE
Reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367369#c8
It's possible to wedge QEMU if the guest tries to reset a virtio-pci
device as QEMU is also using the drive for a blockjob. This patchset
aims to allow us to safely pause/resume jobs attached to individual
nodes in a manner similar
