Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2012-03-12 Thread Lluís Vilanova
Anthony Liguori writes: [...] For v2, I'm relying on a fork of gtk-doc that removes the underscore requirements. I really hate to do this but I like it better than not having documentation. I'm poking in the gtk+ community to see if there's an upstream compromise possible. I don't want to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2011-12-18 Thread Stefan Weil
Am 15.12.2011 11:21, schrieb Kevin Wolf: Am 15.12.2011 10:32, schrieb Stefan Weil: Am 15.12.2011 06:22, schrieb Andreas Färber: Their website has the following: GTK-Doc wasn't originally intended to be a general-purpose documentation tool, so it can be a bit awkward to setup and use. For a

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2011-12-15 Thread Stefan Weil
Am 15.12.2011 06:22, schrieb Andreas Färber: Their website has the following: GTK-Doc wasn't originally intended to be a general-purpose documentation tool, so it can be a bit awkward to setup and use. For a more polished general-purpose documentation tool you may want to look at Doxygen.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2011-12-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:32:20AM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote: Am 15.12.2011 06:22, schrieb Andreas Färber: Their website has the following: GTK-Doc wasn't originally intended to be a general-purpose documentation tool, so it can be a bit awkward to setup and use. For a more polished

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2011-12-15 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 15.12.2011 10:32, schrieb Stefan Weil: Am 15.12.2011 06:22, schrieb Andreas Färber: Their website has the following: GTK-Doc wasn't originally intended to be a general-purpose documentation tool, so it can be a bit awkward to setup and use. For a more polished general-purpose

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2011-12-15 Thread Stefan Weil
Am 15.12.2011 11:04, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:32:20AM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote: Am 15.12.2011 06:22, schrieb Andreas Färber: Their website has the following: GTK-Doc wasn't originally intended to be a general-purpose documentation tool, so it can be a bit awkward

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2011-12-15 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 15.12.2011 11:29, schrieb Stefan Weil: Am 15.12.2011 11:04, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:32:20AM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote: Am 15.12.2011 06:22, schrieb Andreas Färber: Their website has the following: GTK-Doc wasn't originally intended to be a general-purpose

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2011-12-15 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 15.12.2011 12:36, schrieb Andreas Färber: Am 15.12.2011 11:29, schrieb Stefan Weil: Am 15.12.2011 11:04, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:32:20AM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote: Am 15.12.2011 06:22, schrieb Andreas Färber: Their website has the following: GTK-Doc wasn't

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2011-12-14 Thread Anthony Liguori
This series integrates GTK-DOC into our build process via a gtkdoc build target. This is to provide internal API documentation in a more accessible format. Once this gets merged into the tree, I'll add a nightly cron job on qemu.org so that there is always a copy of the latest internal API

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2011-12-14 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.comwrote: For v2, I'm relying on a fork of gtk-doc that removes the underscore requirements. I really hate to do this but I like it better than not having documentation. I'm poking in the gtk+ community to see if there's

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2011-12-14 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 12/14/2011 02:54 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: Hi On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.comwrote: For v2, I'm relying on a fork of gtk-doc that removes the underscore requirements. I really hate to do this but I like it better than not having documentation. I'm

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] GTK-DOC build integration (v2)

2011-12-14 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 14.12.2011 22:08, schrieb Anthony Liguori: On 12/14/2011 02:54 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.comwrote: For v2, I'm relying on a fork of gtk-doc that removes the underscore requirements. I really hate to do this but I like it