On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 17:08 +0100, arm...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com
Many PCI host bridges consist of a sysbus device and a PCI device.
You need both for the thing to work. Arguably, these bridges should
be modelled as a single, composite devices instead of
Marcel Apfelbaum marce...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 17:08 +0100, arm...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com
Many PCI host bridges consist of a sysbus device and a PCI device.
You need both for the thing to work. Arguably, these bridges should
be
Am 30.10.2013 13:30, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Marcel Apfelbaum marce...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 17:08 +0100, arm...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com
Many PCI host bridges consist of a sysbus device and a PCI device.
You need both for the thing
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de writes:
Am 30.10.2013 13:30, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Marcel Apfelbaum marce...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 17:08 +0100, arm...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com
Many PCI host bridges consist of a sysbus device and a
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 14:54 +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de writes:
Am 30.10.2013 13:30, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Marcel Apfelbaum marce...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 17:08 +0100, arm...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Markus Armbruster
From: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com
Many PCI host bridges consist of a sysbus device and a PCI device.
You need both for the thing to work. Arguably, these bridges should
be modelled as a single, composite devices instead of pairs of
seemingly independent devices you can only use together,
