On Thu, 09/13 16:46, Fei Li wrote:
>
>
> On 09/12/2018 03:55 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Fri, 09/07 21:38, Fei Li wrote:
> > > Currently, when qemu_signal_init() fails it only returns a non-zero
> > > value but without propagating any Error. But its callers need a
> > > non-null err when runs err
On 09/12/2018 03:55 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Fri, 09/07 21:38, Fei Li wrote:
Currently, when qemu_signal_init() fails it only returns a non-zero
value but without propagating any Error. But its callers need a
non-null err when runs error_report_err(err), or else 0->msg occurs.
To avoid such s
On Fri, 09/07 21:38, Fei Li wrote:
> Currently, when qemu_signal_init() fails it only returns a non-zero
> value but without propagating any Error. But its callers need a
> non-null err when runs error_report_err(err), or else 0->msg occurs.
>
> To avoid such segmentation fault, add a new Error pa
Currently, when qemu_signal_init() fails it only returns a non-zero
value but without propagating any Error. But its callers need a
non-null err when runs error_report_err(err), or else 0->msg occurs.
To avoid such segmentation fault, add a new Error parameter to make
the call trace to propagate t
