On 04/25/2011 08:10 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 04/25/2011 12:27 PM, Lluís wrote:
But in any case, I'm still not sure if stderr should have programatic
tracing state controls.
Yes, please, stderr is even more useful than simple when you're using it
under gdb.
Agreed, trace control seems
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Fabien Chouteau chout...@adacore.com wrote:
On 04/25/2011 08:10 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 04/25/2011 12:27 PM, Lluís wrote:
But in any case, I'm still not sure if stderr should have programatic
tracing state controls.
Yes, please, stderr is even more useful
On 04/26/2011 02:38 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
The simple backend additionally allows setting and flushing the output
file. It also supports dumping the trace buffer.
I agree that neither of these would be a particularly interesting
addition to the stderr backend.
Paolo
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Fabien Chouteau chout...@adacore.com wrote:
On 04/25/2011 08:10 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 04/25/2011 12:27 PM, Lluís wrote:
But in any case, I'm still not sure if stderr should have programatic
tracing state controls.
Yes, please,
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/23/2011 04:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
For tracing use cases that require performance or runtime
enabling/disabling trace events, just use the simple, ust, or dtrace
backends.
On 04/25/2011 12:27 PM, Lluís wrote:
But in any case, I'm still not sure if stderr should have programatic
tracing state controls.
Yes, please, stderr is even more useful than simple when you're using it
under gdb.
Paolo
On 04/23/2011 04:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
For tracing use cases that require performance or runtime
enabling/disabling trace events, just use the simple, ust, or dtrace
backends.
Having -trace events for the stderr backend would still be nice.
Paolo
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/23/2011 04:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
For tracing use cases that require performance or runtime
enabling/disabling trace events, just use the simple, ust, or dtrace
backends.
Having -trace events for the
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Lluís xscr...@gmx.net wrote:
This includes all the control interfaces already provided by the simple
backend (i.e., command line, programmatic and monitor).
Signed-off-by: Fabien Chouteau chout...@adacore.com
Signed-off-by: Lluís Vilanova vilan...@ac.upc.edu
This includes all the control interfaces already provided by the simple
backend (i.e., command line, programmatic and monitor).
Signed-off-by: Fabien Chouteau chout...@adacore.com
Signed-off-by: Lluís Vilanova vilan...@ac.upc.edu
---
Makefile.objs |8 +++-
configure |3
10 matches
Mail list logo
