On 06/19/2012 11:59 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
Hello,
Here's the 3rd iteration of the virtio-rng device. This update just
rebases the patch on top of current master.
Details on the patch in the commit message.
Hi everyone...
I just stumbled on this patchset after realizing that the virtio-rng
H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com writes:
On 06/19/2012 11:59 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
Hello,
Here's the 3rd iteration of the virtio-rng device. This update just
rebases the patch on top of current master.
Details on the patch in the commit message.
Hi everyone...
I just stumbled on this
On 09/16/2012 04:23 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is *exactly* what the problem is.
If using /dev/urandom is pointless--and so far, many people have made
compelling arguments that it is--then using /dev/random is seemingly
impossible to do fairly.
It is not merely pointless, it is a
On (Sun) 16 Sep 2012 [13:42:46], H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/19/2012 11:59 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
Hello,
Here's the 3rd iteration of the virtio-rng device. This update just
rebases the patch on top of current master.
Details on the patch in the commit message.
Hi everyone...
I just
Right, obviously. However, under no circumstances should /dev/urandom be used!
Amit Shah amit.s...@redhat.com wrote:
On (Sun) 16 Sep 2012 [13:42:46], H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/19/2012 11:59 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
Hello,
Here's the 3rd iteration of the virtio-rng device. This update just
Hello,
Here's the 3rd iteration of the virtio-rng device. This update just
rebases the patch on top of current master.
Details on the patch in the commit message.
Please apply,
Amit
v3:
* rebase to master
* Add file to hw/Makefile.objs instead of Makefile.objs
* Rate-limit
