On 2016-07-19 09:09, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 09:18 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > I was unhappy about the complexity of the second try.
> >
> > Better to convert to normal temps, allowing in rare
> > occasions, spilling the "globals" to the stack in order
> > to satisfy
On 06/24/2016 09:18 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
I was unhappy about the complexity of the second try.
Better to convert to normal temps, allowing in rare
occasions, spilling the "globals" to the stack in order
to satisfy register allocation.
I can no longer provoke an allocation failure on
On 24/06/16 04:48, Richard Henderson wrote:
I was unhappy about the complexity of the second try.
Better to convert to normal temps, allowing in rare
occasions, spilling the "globals" to the stack in order
to satisfy register allocation.
I can no longer provoke an allocation failure on i686.
I was unhappy about the complexity of the second try.
Better to convert to normal temps, allowing in rare
occasions, spilling the "globals" to the stack in order
to satisfy register allocation.
I can no longer provoke an allocation failure on i686.
Hopefully this fixes the OpenBSD case that Mark
