On 10.09.2013 10:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 10 September 2013 09:27, Claudio Fontana claudio.font...@huawei.com
wrote:
On another side, I end up having to manually revert some parts
of these which you put as prerequisites, during bisection when
landing after them, which is a huge time drain
On 10.09.2013 15:16, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/10/2013 01:27 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
There are two aspects.
On one side, although some changes do not break anything, I see some
problems in them.
Then let us discuss them, sooner rather than later.
Putting them as a prerequisite
On 12 September 2013 09:03, Claudio Fontana claudio.font...@huawei.com wrote:
On 10.09.2013 10:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 10 September 2013 09:27, Claudio Fontana claudio.font...@huawei.com
wrote:
On another side, I end up having to manually revert some parts
of these which you put as
On 09.09.2013 17:07, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/09/2013 08:02 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
On 09.09.2013 16:08, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/09/2013 01:13 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
after carefully reading and testing your patches, this is how I suggest to
proceed:
first do the
On 10 September 2013 09:27, Claudio Fontana claudio.font...@huawei.com wrote:
On another side, I end up having to manually revert some parts
of these which you put as prerequisites, during bisection when
landing after them, which is a huge time drain when tracking
regressions introduced in the
On 09/10/2013 01:27 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
There are two aspects.
On one side, although some changes do not break anything, I see some problems
in them.
Then let us discuss them, sooner rather than later.
Putting them as a prerequisite for the rest forces us to agreeing on
everything
Hello Richard,
On 02.09.2013 19:54, Richard Henderson wrote:
I'm not sure if I posted v2 or not, but my branch is named -3,
therefore this is v3. ;-)
The jumbo fixme patch from v1 has been split up. This has been
updated for the changes in the tlb helpers over the past few weeks.
For the
On 09/09/2013 01:13 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
after carefully reading and testing your patches, this is how I suggest to
proceed:
first do the implementation of the new functionality (tcg opcodes, jit) in a
way that is consistent with the existing code.
No type changes, no refactoring,
On 9 September 2013 16:02, Claudio Fontana claudio.font...@huawei.com wrote:
I guess we are stuck then. With the cosmetic and restructuring
stuff coming before, I cannot cherry pick the good parts later.
...what do you need to cherry pick it into?
-- PMM
On 09/09/2013 08:02 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
On 09.09.2013 16:08, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/09/2013 01:13 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
after carefully reading and testing your patches, this is how I suggest to
proceed:
first do the implementation of the new functionality (tcg opcodes,
On 09.09.2013 16:08, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/09/2013 01:13 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
after carefully reading and testing your patches, this is how I suggest to
proceed:
first do the implementation of the new functionality (tcg opcodes, jit) in a
way that is consistent with the
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:54:34AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
I'm not sure if I posted v2 or not, but my branch is named -3,
therefore this is v3. ;-)
The jumbo fixme patch from v1 has been split up. This has been
updated for the changes in the tlb helpers over the past few weeks.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:54:34AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
I'm not sure if I posted v2 or not, but my branch is named -3,
therefore this is v3. ;-)
The jumbo fixme patch from v1 has been split up. This has
On 3 September 2013 08:37, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Is there a way yet to compile and run a 'qemu-system-aarch64'? [on a
regular x86-64 host]
The code for this has not yet been written :-)
The patchset I posted will build a qemu-system-aarch64 but
with no actual 64 bit CPUs
I'm not sure if I posted v2 or not, but my branch is named -3,
therefore this is v3. ;-)
The jumbo fixme patch from v1 has been split up. This has been
updated for the changes in the tlb helpers over the past few weeks.
For the benefit of trivial conflict resolution, it's relative to a
tree
I'm not sure if I posted v2 or not, but my branch is named -3,
therefore this is v3. ;-)
The jumbo fixme patch from v1 has been split up. This has been
updated for the changes in the tlb helpers over the past few weeks.
For the benefit of trivial conflict resolution, it's relative to a
tree
16 matches
Mail list logo
