On 24/09/2018 16:40, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 12:32:37 +0200
> David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
>> When reporting the id of virtio-based memory devices, we always have to
>> take the one of the proxy device (parent), not the one of the memory
>> device directly.
>>
>> Let's
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 12:32:37 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> When reporting the id of virtio-based memory devices, we always have to
> take the one of the proxy device (parent), not the one of the memory
> device directly.
>
> Let's generalize this by allowing memory devices to specify an
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 12:32:37PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> When reporting the id of virtio-based memory devices, we always have to
> take the one of the proxy device (parent), not the one of the memory
> device directly.
>
> Let's generalize this by allowing memory devices to specify an
When reporting the id of virtio-based memory devices, we always have to
take the one of the proxy device (parent), not the one of the memory
device directly.
Let's generalize this by allowing memory devices to specify an optional
"get_device_id" function. This id can then be used to report errors
