On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:37:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 09:53:27AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:28:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2017年07月14日 12:32, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > >On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 04:48:42PM +0800,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 09:53:27AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:28:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2017年07月14日 12:32, Peter Xu wrote:
> > >On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 04:48:42PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >>
> > >>On 2017年07月12日 16:13, Peter Xu wrote:
> > >>>It
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:28:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年07月14日 12:32, Peter Xu wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 04:48:42PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>
> >>On 2017年07月12日 16:13, Peter Xu wrote:
> >>>It is not wise to disgard all the IOTLB cache when cache size reaches
>
On 2017年07月14日 12:32, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 04:48:42PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2017年07月12日 16:13, Peter Xu wrote:
It is not wise to disgard all the IOTLB cache when cache size reaches
max, but that's what we do now. A slightly better (but still simple) way
to do this
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 08:49:44PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:13:43PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > It is not wise to disgard all the IOTLB cache when cache size reaches
> > max, but that's what we do now. A slightly better (but still simple) way
> > to do this is,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 04:48:42PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年07月12日 16:13, Peter Xu wrote:
> >It is not wise to disgard all the IOTLB cache when cache size reaches
> >max, but that's what we do now. A slightly better (but still simple) way
> >to do this is, we just throw away the
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:13:43PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> It is not wise to disgard all the IOTLB cache when cache size reaches
> max, but that's what we do now. A slightly better (but still simple) way
> to do this is, we just throw away the least recent used cache entry.
Not wise how? Slower?
On 2017年07月12日 16:13, Peter Xu wrote:
It is not wise to disgard all the IOTLB cache when cache size reaches
max, but that's what we do now. A slightly better (but still simple) way
to do this is, we just throw away the least recent used cache entry.
This patch implemented MRU list algorithm
It is not wise to disgard all the IOTLB cache when cache size reaches
max, but that's what we do now. A slightly better (but still simple) way
to do this is, we just throw away the least recent used cache entry.
This patch implemented MRU list algorithm for VT-d IOTLB. The main logic
is to
