On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 29.10.2016 um 03:48 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > The object_property_add_bool() call in dummy_init() is always
> > failing because there is an existing "bv" class property. We need
> > to remove either the "bv" class property or
Am 04.11.2016 um 17:07 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 29.10.2016 um 03:48 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
>>> The object_property_add_bool() call in dummy_init() is always
>>> failing because there is an existing "bv" class property. We
Am 29.10.2016 um 03:48 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> The object_property_add_bool() call in dummy_init() is always
> failing because there is an existing "bv" class property. We need
> to remove either the "bv" class property or the "bv" instance
> property.
>
> Remove the class property so both
Markus Armbruster writes:
> Eduardo Habkost writes:
>
>> The object_property_add_bool() call in dummy_init() is always
>> failing because there is an existing "bv" class property. We need
>> to remove either the "bv" class property or the "bv" instance
>>
Eduardo Habkost writes:
> The object_property_add_bool() call in dummy_init() is always
> failing because there is an existing "bv" class property. We need
> to remove either the "bv" class property or the "bv" instance
> property.
>
> Remove the class property so both
The object_property_add_bool() call in dummy_init() is always
failing because there is an existing "bv" class property. We need
to remove either the "bv" class property or the "bv" instance
property.
Remove the class property so both object properties and class
properties are covered by the test