Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/36] ppc/xive: introduce the XIVE Event Notification Descriptors

2018-11-28 Thread David Gibson
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:01:27PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 11/23/18 5:35 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:47:44PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> On 11/22/18 5:41 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:56:58AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater
> wrote:
[snip]
>  +/*
>  + * XiveEND helpers
>  + */
>  +
>  +void xive_end_reset(XiveEND *end)
>  +{
>  +memset(end, 0, sizeof(*end));
>  +
>  +/* switch off the escalation and notification ESBs */
>  +end->w1 = END_W1_ESe_Q | END_W1_ESn_Q;
> >>>
> >>> It's not obvious to me what circumstances this would be called under.
> >>> Since the ENDs are in system memory, a memset() seems like an odd
> >>> thing for (virtual) hardware to be doing to it.
> >>
> >> It makes sense on sPAPR if one day some OS starts using the END ESBs for 
> >> further coalescing of the events. None does for now but I have added the 
> >> model though.
> > 
> > Hrm, I think that belongs in PAPR specific code.  It's not really part
> > of the router model - it's the PAPR stuff configuring the router at
> > reset time (much as firmware would configure it at reset time for bare
> > metal).
> 
> This is true this routine is only used by the H_INT_RESET hcall and by 
> the reset handler of the sPAPR controller model. But it made sense to put 
> this END helper routine with the other END routines. Don't you think so ? 

Actually, no.  In real hardware this would be handled by a different
component - the system firmware would do this setup of the ENDs as it
configures the XIVE.  So it makes sense to do this in a separate
component for PAPR as well.  In this case that's another piece of qemu
(the spapr stuff) rather than being within the VM, but the difference
isn't important to the END handling itself.

-- 
David Gibson| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/36] ppc/xive: introduce the XIVE Event Notification Descriptors

2018-11-23 Thread Cédric Le Goater
On 11/23/18 5:35 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:47:44PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 11/22/18 5:41 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:56:58AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
 To complete the event routing, the IVRE sub-engine uses an internal
 table containing Event Notification Descriptor (END) structures.

 An END specifies on which Event Queue (EQ) the event notification
 data, defined in the associated EAS, should be posted when an
 exception occurs. It also defines which Notification Virtual Target
 (NVT) should be notified.

 The Event Queue is a memory page provided by the O/S defining a
 circular buffer, one per server and priority couple, containing Event
 Queue entries. These are 4 bytes long, the first bit being a
 'generation' bit and the 31 following bits the END Data field. They
 are pulled by the O/S when the exception occurs.

 The END Data field is a way to set an invariant logical event source
 number for an IRQ. It is set with the H_INT_SET_SOURCE_CONFIG hcall
 when the EISN flag is used.

 Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater 
 ---
  include/hw/ppc/xive.h  |  18 
  include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h |  48 ++
  hw/intc/xive.c | 185 -
  3 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
 index 5a0696366577..ce62aaf28343 100644
 --- a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
 +++ b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
 @@ -193,11 +193,29 @@ typedef struct XiveRouterClass {
  /* XIVE table accessors */
  int (*get_eas)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
  int (*set_eas)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
 +int (*get_end)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
 +   XiveEND *end);
 +int (*set_end)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
 +   XiveEND *end);
>>>
>>> Hrm.  So unlike the EAS, which is basically just a word, the END is a
>>> pretty large structure.  
>>
>> yes. and so will be the NVT.
>>
>>> It's unclear here if get/set are expected to copy the whole thing out 
>>> and in, 
>>
>> That's the plan. 
> 
> Yeah, I don't think that's a good idea.  In some cases the updates are
> on hot paths, so the extra copy isn't good, and more importantly it
> makes it look like an atomic update, but it's not really.
> 
> Well... I guess it probably is because of the BQL, but I'd prefer not
> to rely on that excessively.
> 
>> What I had in mind are memory accessors to the XIVE structures, which 
>> are local to QEMU for sPAPR and in the guest RAM for PowerNV (Please
>> take a look at the XIVE PowerNV model).
>>
>>> or if get give you a pointer into a "live" structure 
>>
>> no
>>
>>> and set just does any necessary barriers after an update.
>> that would be too complex for the PowerNV model I think. There is a cache
>> in between the software running on the (QEMU) machine and the XIVE HW but
>> it would be hard to handle. 
>>  
>>> Really, for a non-atomic value like this, I'm not sure get/set is the
>>> right model.
>>
>> ok. we need something to get them out and in.
> 
> I've thought about this a bit more.  What I think might work is
> "end_read" and "end_write" callbacks, which take a word number in
> addition to the parameters you have already

ouch. This is not going to simplify the routing algo where all the get and
set are done. The whole END is needed in the END trigger. So we will need
routines to get and set the whole END.

The NVT is not used too much for the moment. 

>>> Also as I understand it nearly all the indices in XIVE are broken into
>>> block/index.  Is there a reason those are folded together into lisn
>>> for the EAS, but not for the END?
>>
>> The indexing of the EAT is global to the sytem and the index defines
>> which blk to use. The IRQ source numbers on the powerbus are architected 
>> to be :
>>
>> #define XIVE_SRCNO(blk, idx)  ((uint32_t)(blk) << 28 | (idx))
>>
>> and XIVE can use different strategies to identify the XIVE IC in charge 
>> of routing. It can be a one-to-one chip to block relation as skiboot does. 
>> Using a block scope table is possible also. Our model only supports one 
>> block per chip and some shortcuts are taken but not that much in fact.
>>  
>> Remote access to the XIVE structures of another chip are done through 
>> MMIO (not modeled in PowerNV) and the blkid is used to partition the MMIO 
>> regions. Being local is better for performance because the END and NVT 
>> tables have a strong relation with the XIVE subengines using them 
>> (VC and PC).  
>>
>> May be, Ben can clarified it this is badly explained.
> 
> Right.. I think I understand what the blocks are all about.
> 
> But my question is, why encode the block and index together for the
> EAS, but 

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/36] ppc/xive: introduce the XIVE Event Notification Descriptors

2018-11-22 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:47:44PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 11/22/18 5:41 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:56:58AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> To complete the event routing, the IVRE sub-engine uses an internal
> >> table containing Event Notification Descriptor (END) structures.
> >>
> >> An END specifies on which Event Queue (EQ) the event notification
> >> data, defined in the associated EAS, should be posted when an
> >> exception occurs. It also defines which Notification Virtual Target
> >> (NVT) should be notified.
> >>
> >> The Event Queue is a memory page provided by the O/S defining a
> >> circular buffer, one per server and priority couple, containing Event
> >> Queue entries. These are 4 bytes long, the first bit being a
> >> 'generation' bit and the 31 following bits the END Data field. They
> >> are pulled by the O/S when the exception occurs.
> >>
> >> The END Data field is a way to set an invariant logical event source
> >> number for an IRQ. It is set with the H_INT_SET_SOURCE_CONFIG hcall
> >> when the EISN flag is used.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater 
> >> ---
> >>  include/hw/ppc/xive.h  |  18 
> >>  include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h |  48 ++
> >>  hw/intc/xive.c | 185 -
> >>  3 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> >> index 5a0696366577..ce62aaf28343 100644
> >> --- a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> >> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> >> @@ -193,11 +193,29 @@ typedef struct XiveRouterClass {
> >>  /* XIVE table accessors */
> >>  int (*get_eas)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
> >>  int (*set_eas)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
> >> +int (*get_end)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
> >> +   XiveEND *end);
> >> +int (*set_end)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
> >> +   XiveEND *end);
> > 
> > Hrm.  So unlike the EAS, which is basically just a word, the END is a
> > pretty large structure.  
> 
> yes. and so will be the NVT.
> 
> > It's unclear here if get/set are expected to copy the whole thing out 
> > and in, 
> 
> That's the plan. 

Yeah, I don't think that's a good idea.  In some cases the updates are
on hot paths, so the extra copy isn't good, and more importantly it
makes it look like an atomic update, but it's not really.

Well... I guess it probably is because of the BQL, but I'd prefer not
to rely on that excessively.

> What I had in mind are memory accessors to the XIVE structures, which 
> are local to QEMU for sPAPR and in the guest RAM for PowerNV (Please
> take a look at the XIVE PowerNV model).
> 
> > or if get give you a pointer into a "live" structure 
> 
> no
> 
> > and set just does any necessary barriers after an update.
> that would be too complex for the PowerNV model I think. There is a cache
> in between the software running on the (QEMU) machine and the XIVE HW but
> it would be hard to handle. 
>  
> > Really, for a non-atomic value like this, I'm not sure get/set is the
> > right model.
> 
> ok. we need something to get them out and in.

I've thought about this a bit more.  What I think might work is
"end_read" and "end_write" callbacks, which take a word number in
addition to the parameters you have already

> > Also as I understand it nearly all the indices in XIVE are broken into
> > block/index.  Is there a reason those are folded together into lisn
> > for the EAS, but not for the END?
> 
> The indexing of the EAT is global to the sytem and the index defines
> which blk to use. The IRQ source numbers on the powerbus are architected 
> to be :
> 
> #define XIVE_SRCNO(blk, idx)  ((uint32_t)(blk) << 28 | (idx))
> 
> and XIVE can use different strategies to identify the XIVE IC in charge 
> of routing. It can be a one-to-one chip to block relation as skiboot does. 
> Using a block scope table is possible also. Our model only supports one 
> block per chip and some shortcuts are taken but not that much in fact.
>  
> Remote access to the XIVE structures of another chip are done through 
> MMIO (not modeled in PowerNV) and the blkid is used to partition the MMIO 
> regions. Being local is better for performance because the END and NVT 
> tables have a strong relation with the XIVE subengines using them 
> (VC and PC). 
> 
> May be, Ben can clarified it this is badly explained.

Right.. I think I understand what the blocks are all about.

But my question is, why encode the block and index together for the
EAS, but separately for the END?

> 
> >>  } XiveRouterClass;
> >>  
> >>  void xive_eas_pic_print_info(XiveEAS *eas, uint32_t lisn, Monitor *mon);
> >>  
> >>  int xive_router_get_eas(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
> >>  int xive_router_set_eas(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
> >> +int xive_router_get_end(XiveRouter 

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/36] ppc/xive: introduce the XIVE Event Notification Descriptors

2018-11-22 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 05:49:09PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-11-22 at 15:41 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > 
> > > +void xive_end_reset(XiveEND *end)
> > > +{
> > > +memset(end, 0, sizeof(*end));
> > > +
> > > +/* switch off the escalation and notification ESBs */
> > > +end->w1 = END_W1_ESe_Q | END_W1_ESn_Q;
> > 
> > It's not obvious to me what circumstances this would be called under.
> > Since the ENDs are in system memory, a memset() seems like an odd
> > thing for (virtual) hardware to be doing to it.
> > 
> > > +}
> 
> Not on PAPR ...

Right, so the memset() can go in PAPR specific code.

-- 
David Gibson| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/36] ppc/xive: introduce the XIVE Event Notification Descriptors

2018-11-22 Thread Cédric Le Goater
On 11/22/18 5:41 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:56:58AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> To complete the event routing, the IVRE sub-engine uses an internal
>> table containing Event Notification Descriptor (END) structures.
>>
>> An END specifies on which Event Queue (EQ) the event notification
>> data, defined in the associated EAS, should be posted when an
>> exception occurs. It also defines which Notification Virtual Target
>> (NVT) should be notified.
>>
>> The Event Queue is a memory page provided by the O/S defining a
>> circular buffer, one per server and priority couple, containing Event
>> Queue entries. These are 4 bytes long, the first bit being a
>> 'generation' bit and the 31 following bits the END Data field. They
>> are pulled by the O/S when the exception occurs.
>>
>> The END Data field is a way to set an invariant logical event source
>> number for an IRQ. It is set with the H_INT_SET_SOURCE_CONFIG hcall
>> when the EISN flag is used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater 
>> ---
>>  include/hw/ppc/xive.h  |  18 
>>  include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h |  48 ++
>>  hw/intc/xive.c | 185 -
>>  3 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
>> index 5a0696366577..ce62aaf28343 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
>> @@ -193,11 +193,29 @@ typedef struct XiveRouterClass {
>>  /* XIVE table accessors */
>>  int (*get_eas)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
>>  int (*set_eas)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
>> +int (*get_end)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
>> +   XiveEND *end);
>> +int (*set_end)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
>> +   XiveEND *end);
> 
> Hrm.  So unlike the EAS, which is basically just a word, the END is a
> pretty large structure.  

yes. and so will be the NVT.

> It's unclear here if get/set are expected to copy the whole thing out 
> and in, 

That's the plan. 

What I had in mind are memory accessors to the XIVE structures, which 
are local to QEMU for sPAPR and in the guest RAM for PowerNV (Please
take a look at the XIVE PowerNV model).

> or if get give you a pointer into a "live" structure 

no

> and set just does any necessary barriers after an update.
that would be too complex for the PowerNV model I think. There is a cache
in between the software running on the (QEMU) machine and the XIVE HW but
it would be hard to handle. 
 
> Really, for a non-atomic value like this, I'm not sure get/set is the
> right model.

ok. we need something to get them out and in.

> Also as I understand it nearly all the indices in XIVE are broken into
> block/index.  Is there a reason those are folded together into lisn
> for the EAS, but not for the END?

The indexing of the EAT is global to the sytem and the index defines
which blk to use. The IRQ source numbers on the powerbus are architected 
to be :

#define XIVE_SRCNO(blk, idx)  ((uint32_t)(blk) << 28 | (idx))

and XIVE can use different strategies to identify the XIVE IC in charge 
of routing. It can be a one-to-one chip to block relation as skiboot does. 
Using a block scope table is possible also. Our model only supports one 
block per chip and some shortcuts are taken but not that much in fact.
 
Remote access to the XIVE structures of another chip are done through 
MMIO (not modeled in PowerNV) and the blkid is used to partition the MMIO 
regions. Being local is better for performance because the END and NVT 
tables have a strong relation with the XIVE subengines using them 
(VC and PC). 

May be, Ben can clarified it this is badly explained. 

>>  } XiveRouterClass;
>>  
>>  void xive_eas_pic_print_info(XiveEAS *eas, uint32_t lisn, Monitor *mon);
>>  
>>  int xive_router_get_eas(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
>>  int xive_router_set_eas(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
>> +int xive_router_get_end(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
>> +XiveEND *end);
>> +int xive_router_set_end(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
>> +XiveEND *end);
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * For legacy compatibility, the exceptions define up to 256 different
>> + * priorities. P9 implements only 9 levels : 8 active levels [0 - 7]
>> + * and the least favored level 0xFF.
>> + */
>> +#define XIVE_PRIORITY_MAX  7
>> +
>> +void xive_end_reset(XiveEND *end);
>> +void xive_end_pic_print_info(XiveEND *end, uint32_t end_idx, Monitor *mon);
>>  
>>  #endif /* PPC_XIVE_H */
>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h b/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h
>> index 12499b33614c..f97fb2b90bee 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h
>> @@ -28,4 +28,52 @@ typedef struct XiveEAS {
>>  #define EAS_END_DATAPPC_BITMASK(33, 63)  /* 

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/36] ppc/xive: introduce the XIVE Event Notification Descriptors

2018-11-21 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2018-11-22 at 15:41 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> 
> > +void xive_end_reset(XiveEND *end)
> > +{
> > +memset(end, 0, sizeof(*end));
> > +
> > +/* switch off the escalation and notification ESBs */
> > +end->w1 = END_W1_ESe_Q | END_W1_ESn_Q;
> 
> It's not obvious to me what circumstances this would be called under.
> Since the ENDs are in system memory, a memset() seems like an odd
> thing for (virtual) hardware to be doing to it.
> 
> > +}

Not on PAPR ...

Ben.





Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/36] ppc/xive: introduce the XIVE Event Notification Descriptors

2018-11-21 Thread David Gibson
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:56:58AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> To complete the event routing, the IVRE sub-engine uses an internal
> table containing Event Notification Descriptor (END) structures.
> 
> An END specifies on which Event Queue (EQ) the event notification
> data, defined in the associated EAS, should be posted when an
> exception occurs. It also defines which Notification Virtual Target
> (NVT) should be notified.
> 
> The Event Queue is a memory page provided by the O/S defining a
> circular buffer, one per server and priority couple, containing Event
> Queue entries. These are 4 bytes long, the first bit being a
> 'generation' bit and the 31 following bits the END Data field. They
> are pulled by the O/S when the exception occurs.
> 
> The END Data field is a way to set an invariant logical event source
> number for an IRQ. It is set with the H_INT_SET_SOURCE_CONFIG hcall
> when the EISN flag is used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater 
> ---
>  include/hw/ppc/xive.h  |  18 
>  include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h |  48 ++
>  hw/intc/xive.c | 185 -
>  3 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> index 5a0696366577..ce62aaf28343 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> @@ -193,11 +193,29 @@ typedef struct XiveRouterClass {
>  /* XIVE table accessors */
>  int (*get_eas)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
>  int (*set_eas)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
> +int (*get_end)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
> +   XiveEND *end);
> +int (*set_end)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
> +   XiveEND *end);

Hrm.  So unlike the EAS, which is basically just a word, the END is a
pretty large structure.  It's unclear here if get/set are expected to
copy the whole thing out and in, or if get get give you a pointer into
a "live" structure and set just does any necessary barriers after an
update.

Really, for a non-atomic value like this, I'm not sure get/set is the
right model.

Also as I understand it nearly all the indices in XIVE are broken into
block/index.  Is there a reason those are folded together into lisn
for the EAS, but not for the END?

>  } XiveRouterClass;
>  
>  void xive_eas_pic_print_info(XiveEAS *eas, uint32_t lisn, Monitor *mon);
>  
>  int xive_router_get_eas(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
>  int xive_router_set_eas(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
> +int xive_router_get_end(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
> +XiveEND *end);
> +int xive_router_set_end(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
> +XiveEND *end);
> +
> +/*
> + * For legacy compatibility, the exceptions define up to 256 different
> + * priorities. P9 implements only 9 levels : 8 active levels [0 - 7]
> + * and the least favored level 0xFF.
> + */
> +#define XIVE_PRIORITY_MAX  7
> +
> +void xive_end_reset(XiveEND *end);
> +void xive_end_pic_print_info(XiveEND *end, uint32_t end_idx, Monitor *mon);
>  
>  #endif /* PPC_XIVE_H */
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h b/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h
> index 12499b33614c..f97fb2b90bee 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h
> @@ -28,4 +28,52 @@ typedef struct XiveEAS {
>  #define EAS_END_DATAPPC_BITMASK(33, 63)  /* Data written to the END 
> */
>  } XiveEAS;
>  
> +/* Event Notification Descriptor (END) */
> +typedef struct XiveEND {
> +uint32_tw0;
> +#define END_W0_VALID PPC_BIT32(0) /* "v" bit */
> +#define END_W0_ENQUEUE   PPC_BIT32(1) /* "q" bit */
> +#define END_W0_UCOND_NOTIFY  PPC_BIT32(2) /* "n" bit */
> +#define END_W0_BACKLOG   PPC_BIT32(3) /* "b" bit */
> +#define END_W0_PRECL_ESC_CTL PPC_BIT32(4) /* "p" bit */
> +#define END_W0_ESCALATE_CTL  PPC_BIT32(5) /* "e" bit */
> +#define END_W0_UNCOND_ESCALATE   PPC_BIT32(6) /* "u" bit - DD2.0 */
> +#define END_W0_SILENT_ESCALATE   PPC_BIT32(7) /* "s" bit - DD2.0 */
> +#define END_W0_QSIZE PPC_BITMASK32(12, 15)
> +#define END_W0_SW0   PPC_BIT32(16)
> +#define END_W0_FIRMWARE  END_W0_SW0 /* Owned by FW */
> +#define END_QSIZE_4K 0
> +#define END_QSIZE_64K4
> +#define END_W0_HWDEP PPC_BITMASK32(24, 31)
> +uint32_tw1;
> +#define END_W1_ESn   PPC_BITMASK32(0, 1)
> +#define END_W1_ESn_P PPC_BIT32(0)
> +#define END_W1_ESn_Q PPC_BIT32(1)
> +#define END_W1_ESe   PPC_BITMASK32(2, 3)
> +#define END_W1_ESe_P PPC_BIT32(2)
> +#define END_W1_ESe_Q PPC_BIT32(3)
> +#define END_W1_GENERATIONPPC_BIT32(9)
> +#define END_W1_PAGE_OFF  PPC_BITMASK32(10, 31)
> +uint32_tw2;
> 

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 05/36] ppc/xive: introduce the XIVE Event Notification Descriptors

2018-11-16 Thread Cédric Le Goater
To complete the event routing, the IVRE sub-engine uses an internal
table containing Event Notification Descriptor (END) structures.

An END specifies on which Event Queue (EQ) the event notification
data, defined in the associated EAS, should be posted when an
exception occurs. It also defines which Notification Virtual Target
(NVT) should be notified.

The Event Queue is a memory page provided by the O/S defining a
circular buffer, one per server and priority couple, containing Event
Queue entries. These are 4 bytes long, the first bit being a
'generation' bit and the 31 following bits the END Data field. They
are pulled by the O/S when the exception occurs.

The END Data field is a way to set an invariant logical event source
number for an IRQ. It is set with the H_INT_SET_SOURCE_CONFIG hcall
when the EISN flag is used.

Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater 
---
 include/hw/ppc/xive.h  |  18 
 include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h |  48 ++
 hw/intc/xive.c | 185 -
 3 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
index 5a0696366577..ce62aaf28343 100644
--- a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
+++ b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
@@ -193,11 +193,29 @@ typedef struct XiveRouterClass {
 /* XIVE table accessors */
 int (*get_eas)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
 int (*set_eas)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
+int (*get_end)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
+   XiveEND *end);
+int (*set_end)(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
+   XiveEND *end);
 } XiveRouterClass;
 
 void xive_eas_pic_print_info(XiveEAS *eas, uint32_t lisn, Monitor *mon);
 
 int xive_router_get_eas(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
 int xive_router_set_eas(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint32_t lisn, XiveEAS *eas);
+int xive_router_get_end(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
+XiveEND *end);
+int xive_router_set_end(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t end_blk, uint32_t end_idx,
+XiveEND *end);
+
+/*
+ * For legacy compatibility, the exceptions define up to 256 different
+ * priorities. P9 implements only 9 levels : 8 active levels [0 - 7]
+ * and the least favored level 0xFF.
+ */
+#define XIVE_PRIORITY_MAX  7
+
+void xive_end_reset(XiveEND *end);
+void xive_end_pic_print_info(XiveEND *end, uint32_t end_idx, Monitor *mon);
 
 #endif /* PPC_XIVE_H */
diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h b/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h
index 12499b33614c..f97fb2b90bee 100644
--- a/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h
+++ b/include/hw/ppc/xive_regs.h
@@ -28,4 +28,52 @@ typedef struct XiveEAS {
 #define EAS_END_DATAPPC_BITMASK(33, 63)  /* Data written to the END */
 } XiveEAS;
 
+/* Event Notification Descriptor (END) */
+typedef struct XiveEND {
+uint32_tw0;
+#define END_W0_VALID PPC_BIT32(0) /* "v" bit */
+#define END_W0_ENQUEUE   PPC_BIT32(1) /* "q" bit */
+#define END_W0_UCOND_NOTIFY  PPC_BIT32(2) /* "n" bit */
+#define END_W0_BACKLOG   PPC_BIT32(3) /* "b" bit */
+#define END_W0_PRECL_ESC_CTL PPC_BIT32(4) /* "p" bit */
+#define END_W0_ESCALATE_CTL  PPC_BIT32(5) /* "e" bit */
+#define END_W0_UNCOND_ESCALATE   PPC_BIT32(6) /* "u" bit - DD2.0 */
+#define END_W0_SILENT_ESCALATE   PPC_BIT32(7) /* "s" bit - DD2.0 */
+#define END_W0_QSIZE PPC_BITMASK32(12, 15)
+#define END_W0_SW0   PPC_BIT32(16)
+#define END_W0_FIRMWARE  END_W0_SW0 /* Owned by FW */
+#define END_QSIZE_4K 0
+#define END_QSIZE_64K4
+#define END_W0_HWDEP PPC_BITMASK32(24, 31)
+uint32_tw1;
+#define END_W1_ESn   PPC_BITMASK32(0, 1)
+#define END_W1_ESn_P PPC_BIT32(0)
+#define END_W1_ESn_Q PPC_BIT32(1)
+#define END_W1_ESe   PPC_BITMASK32(2, 3)
+#define END_W1_ESe_P PPC_BIT32(2)
+#define END_W1_ESe_Q PPC_BIT32(3)
+#define END_W1_GENERATIONPPC_BIT32(9)
+#define END_W1_PAGE_OFF  PPC_BITMASK32(10, 31)
+uint32_tw2;
+#define END_W2_MIGRATION_REG PPC_BITMASK32(0, 3)
+#define END_W2_OP_DESC_HIPPC_BITMASK32(4, 31)
+uint32_tw3;
+#define END_W3_OP_DESC_LOPPC_BITMASK32(0, 31)
+uint32_tw4;
+#define END_W4_ESC_END_BLOCK PPC_BITMASK32(4, 7)
+#define END_W4_ESC_END_INDEX PPC_BITMASK32(8, 31)
+uint32_tw5;
+#define END_W5_ESC_END_DATA  PPC_BITMASK32(1, 31)
+uint32_tw6;
+#define END_W6_FORMAT_BITPPC_BIT32(8)
+#define END_W6_NVT_BLOCK PPC_BITMASK32(9, 12)
+#define END_W6_NVT_INDEX PPC_BITMASK32(13, 31)
+uint32_tw7;
+#define END_W7_F0_IGNORE PPC_BIT32(0)
+#define END_W7_F0_BLK_GROUPING   PPC_BIT32(1)
+#define END_W7_F0_PRIORITY   PPC_BITMASK32(8, 15)
+#define END_W7_F1_WAKEZ