Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2] Strawman proposal for NBD structured replies

2016-03-30 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/30/2016 01:33 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Morning, > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:59:15AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote: >> On 30 Mar 2016, at 00:17, Eric Blake wrote: -The server replies with: +Replies take one of two forms. They may either be structured

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2] Strawman proposal for NBD structured replies

2016-03-30 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Morning, On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:59:15AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote: > On 30 Mar 2016, at 00:17, Eric Blake wrote: > >> > >> -The server replies with: > >> +Replies take one of two forms. They may either be structured replies, > > > > Hmm, you put your strawman directly in

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2] Strawman proposal for NBD structured replies

2016-03-30 Thread Alex Bligh
On 30 Mar 2016, at 00:17, Eric Blake wrote: >> >> -The server replies with: >> +Replies take one of two forms. They may either be structured replies, > > Hmm, you put your strawman directly in the 'transmission phase' section, > while mine is deferred to the 'Experimental

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2] Strawman proposal for NBD structured replies

2016-03-29 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/29/2016 04:48 PM, Alex Bligh wrote: > Here's a strawman for the structured reply section. I haven't > covered negotation. > > Also at: > https://github.com/abligh/nbd/tree/strawman-structured-reply > Markdown at: >

[Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2] Strawman proposal for NBD structured replies

2016-03-29 Thread Alex Bligh
Here's a strawman for the structured reply section. I haven't covered negotation. Also at: https://github.com/abligh/nbd/tree/strawman-structured-reply Markdown at: https://github.com/abligh/nbd/blob/strawman-structured-reply/doc/proto.md Changes since v1: * Fixed some formatting *