On 13.06.2013 05:30, Wenchao Xia wrote:
于 2013-6-10 18:14, Peter Lieven 写道:
on incoming migration do not memset pages to zero if they already read as
zero.
this will allocate a new zero page and consume memory unnecessarily. even
if we madvise a MADV_DONTNEED later this will only deallocate
于 2013-6-10 18:14, Peter Lieven 写道:
on incoming migration do not memset pages to zero if they already read as
zero.
this will allocate a new zero page and consume memory unnecessarily. even
if we madvise a MADV_DONTNEED later this will only deallocate the memory
asynchronously.
on incoming migration do not memset pages to zero if they already read as zero.
this will allocate a new zero page and consume memory unnecessarily. even
if we madvise a MADV_DONTNEED later this will only deallocate the memory
asynchronously.
Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven p...@kamp.de
---
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:14:20PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
on incoming migration do not memset pages to zero if they already read as
zero.
this will allocate a new zero page and consume memory unnecessarily. even
if we madvise a MADV_DONTNEED later this will only deallocate the memory
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:10:29AM -0500, mdroth wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:14:20PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
on incoming migration do not memset pages to zero if they already read as
zero.
this will allocate a new zero page and consume memory unnecessarily. even
if we madvise a
On 06/10/2013 01:14 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
on incoming migration do not memset pages to zero if they already read as
zero.
this will allocate a new zero page and consume memory unnecessarily. even
if we madvise a MADV_DONTNEED later this will only deallocate the memory
asynchronously.
Am 10.06.2013 um 18:10 schrieb mdroth mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:14:20PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
on incoming migration do not memset pages to zero if they already read as
zero.
this will allocate a new zero page and consume memory unnecessarily. even
if we
