On 03/15/2012 04:00 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
This changes implementations of all iov_*
functions, completing the previous step.
All iov_* functions now ensure that this offset
argument is within the iovec (using assertion),
but lets to specify `bytes' value larger than
actual length of the
On 03/15/2012 04:00 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
This changes implementations of all iov_*
functions, completing the previous step.
All iov_* functions now ensure that this offset
argument is within the iovec (using assertion),
but lets to specify `bytes' value larger than
actual length of the
On 16.03.2012 20:17, Anthony Liguori wrote:
It makes me nervous to make a change like this as it has wide impact on the
rest of the code base. Could you include a unit test that tests the various
boundary conditions of this code?
Is the below code a good unit test?
Thanks,
/mjt
This changes implementations of all iov_*
functions, completing the previous step.
All iov_* functions now ensure that this offset
argument is within the iovec (using assertion),
but lets to specify `bytes' value larger than
actual length of the iovec - in this case they
stops at the actual end
