On 04/24/2017 08:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -n = psectors_inter;
>>> + offset + pnum_inter < (intermediate->total_sectors *
>>> +BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE))) {
>>
>> Naive question: not worth using either bdrv_getlength for bytes, or the
On 04/24/2017 08:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/24/2017 06:06 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/11/2017 06:29 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
>>> byte-based. In the common case, allocation is unlikely to ever use
>>> values that are
On 04/24/2017 06:06 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 04/11/2017 06:29 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
>> byte-based. In the common case, allocation is unlikely to ever use
>> values that are not naturally sector-aligned, but it is
On 04/11/2017 06:29 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
> byte-based. In the common case, allocation is unlikely to ever use
> values that are not naturally sector-aligned, but it is possible
> that byte-based values will let us be more
