On 04/25/11 14:27, Ian Molton wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 13:51 +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Hiding things you miss when reading the code, it's a classic for
people to do if(foo) bleh(); on the same line, and whoever reads
the code will expect the action on the next line, especially if foo
is
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 13:51 +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
What kind of coding error does splitting this out aim to prevent?
missing break; / return; statements? Because I dont see how it
achieves
that...
Hiding things you miss when reading the code, it's a classic for
people
to do if(foo)
On 04/21/2011 03:50 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 04/18/11 17:02, Michael Roth wrote:
+static const char *ga_log_level_str(GLogLevelFlags level)
+{
+switch (level G_LOG_LEVEL_MASK) {
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR: return error;
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL: return critical;
+
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 08:21 -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
+switch (level G_LOG_LEVEL_MASK) {
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR: return error;
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL: return critical;
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_WARNING: return warning;
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_MESSAGE:
On 04/22/11 11:23, Ian Molton wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 08:21 -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
+switch (level G_LOG_LEVEL_MASK) {
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR: return error;
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL: return critical;
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_WARNING: return warning;
+
On 04/18/11 17:02, Michael Roth wrote:
+static const char *ga_log_level_str(GLogLevelFlags level)
+{
+switch (level G_LOG_LEVEL_MASK) {
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR: return error;
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL: return critical;
+case G_LOG_LEVEL_WARNING: return
This is the actual guest daemon, it listens for requests over a
virtio-serial/isa-serial/unix socket channel and routes them through
to dispatch routines, and writes the results back to the channel in
a manner similar to QMP.
A shorthand invocation:
qemu-ga -d
Is equivalent to:
qemu-ga -c
