On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:04:13 +0100
Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/18/14 17:36, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:32:35 +0100
> > Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> >> On So, 2014-02-16 at 17:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wro
On 02/18/14 17:36, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:32:35 +0100
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
>> On So, 2014-02-16 at 17:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Since introduction of PCIHP, it became problematic to
p
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:29:20 +0100
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Fr, 2014-02-07 at 13:51 +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Since introduction of PCIHP, it became problematic to
> > punch hole in PCI0._CRS statically since PCI hotplug
> > region size became runtime changeable.
> >
> > So replace static
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:32:35 +0100
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On So, 2014-02-16 at 17:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > Since introduction of PCIHP, it became problematic to
> > > punch hole in PCI0._CRS statically since PCI h
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:33:17 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:10:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:02:18 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:33:23AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 16 Feb
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:10:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:02:18 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:33:23AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:53:45 +0200
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:02:18 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:33:23AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:53:45 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > Since introduct
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:46:13AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mo, 2014-02-17 at 12:28 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:32:35AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > On So, 2014-02-16 at 17:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:51:27P
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:33:23AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:53:45 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > Since introduction of PCIHP, it became problematic to
> > > punch hole in PCI0._CRS statical
On Mo, 2014-02-17 at 12:28 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:32:35AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > On So, 2014-02-16 at 17:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > Since introduction of PCIHP, it b
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:53:45 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Since introduction of PCIHP, it became problematic to
> > punch hole in PCI0._CRS statically since PCI hotplug
> > region size became runtime changeable.
>
> What m
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:32:35AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On So, 2014-02-16 at 17:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > Since introduction of PCIHP, it became problematic to
> > > punch hole in PCI0._CRS statically since
On So, 2014-02-16 at 17:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Since introduction of PCIHP, it became problematic to
> > punch hole in PCI0._CRS statically since PCI hotplug
> > region size became runtime changeable.
>
> What makes
On Fr, 2014-02-07 at 13:51 +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Since introduction of PCIHP, it became problematic to
> punch hole in PCI0._CRS statically since PCI hotplug
> region size became runtime changeable.
>
> So replace static hole punching with dynamically consumed
> resources in a child device
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Since introduction of PCIHP, it became problematic to
> punch hole in PCI0._CRS statically since PCI hotplug
> region size became runtime changeable.
What makes it runtime changeable?
> So replace static hole punching with dynamical
Since introduction of PCIHP, it became problematic to
punch hole in PCI0._CRS statically since PCI hotplug
region size became runtime changeable.
So replace static hole punching with dynamically consumed
resources in a child device on PCI0 bus. i.e generate
PNP0C02 device as a child of PCI0 bus at
16 matches
Mail list logo
