Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 03/29] io: fix qio_channel_socket_accept err handling
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:55:08AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:25:19AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:53:39PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > > * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > When accept failed, we should setup errp with the reason. More > > > > > importantly, the caller may assume errp be non-NULL when error > > > > > happens, > > > > > and not setting the errp may crash QEMU. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu> > > > > --- > > > > > io/channel-socket.c | 1 + > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/io/channel-socket.c b/io/channel-socket.c > > > > > index 53386b7..7bc308e 100644 > > > > > --- a/io/channel-socket.c > > > > > +++ b/io/channel-socket.c > > > > > @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ qio_channel_socket_accept(QIOChannelSocket *ioc, > > > > > if (errno == EINTR) { > > > > > goto retry; > > > > > } > > > > > +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Unable to accept connection"); > > > > > goto error; > > > > > > > > OK, but this code actually has a bigger problem as well: > > > > > > > > the original is: > > > > > > > > cioc->fd = qemu_accept(ioc->fd, (struct sockaddr > > > > *)>remoteAddr, > > > >>remoteAddrLen); > > > > if (cioc->fd < 0) { > > > > trace_qio_channel_socket_accept_fail(ioc); > > > > if (errno == EINTR) { > > > > goto retry; > > > > } > > > > goto error; > > > > } > > > > > > > > Stefan confirmed that trace_ doesn't preserve errno; so the if > > > > following it is wrong. It needs to preserve errno. > > > > > > Ah... If so, not sure whether we can do the reservation in trace codes > > > in general? > > > > > > For this one, I can just move the trace_*() below the errno check. > > > After all, if EINTR is got, it's not really a fail, so imho we should > > > not trace it with "accept fail". > > > > Agreed, we just need to move the trace below the if. > > Peter: Can you split this as a separate patch and it seems OK to try and > put this in 2.10 since it's a strict bug fix. Sure! Then I'll possibly include the comment fix patch as well. -- Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 03/29] io: fix qio_channel_socket_accept err handling
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:25:19AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:53:39PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > When accept failed, we should setup errp with the reason. More > > > > importantly, the caller may assume errp be non-NULL when error happens, > > > > and not setting the errp may crash QEMU. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu> > > > --- > > > > io/channel-socket.c | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/io/channel-socket.c b/io/channel-socket.c > > > > index 53386b7..7bc308e 100644 > > > > --- a/io/channel-socket.c > > > > +++ b/io/channel-socket.c > > > > @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ qio_channel_socket_accept(QIOChannelSocket *ioc, > > > > if (errno == EINTR) { > > > > goto retry; > > > > } > > > > +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Unable to accept connection"); > > > > goto error; > > > > > > OK, but this code actually has a bigger problem as well: > > > > > > the original is: > > > > > > cioc->fd = qemu_accept(ioc->fd, (struct sockaddr *)>remoteAddr, > > >>remoteAddrLen); > > > if (cioc->fd < 0) { > > > trace_qio_channel_socket_accept_fail(ioc); > > > if (errno == EINTR) { > > > goto retry; > > > } > > > goto error; > > > } > > > > > > Stefan confirmed that trace_ doesn't preserve errno; so the if > > > following it is wrong. It needs to preserve errno. > > > > Ah... If so, not sure whether we can do the reservation in trace codes > > in general? > > > > For this one, I can just move the trace_*() below the errno check. > > After all, if EINTR is got, it's not really a fail, so imho we should > > not trace it with "accept fail". > > Agreed, we just need to move the trace below the if. Peter: Can you split this as a separate patch and it seems OK to try and put this in 2.10 since it's a strict bug fix. Dave > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 03/29] io: fix qio_channel_socket_accept err handling
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:25:19AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:53:39PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > When accept failed, we should setup errp with the reason. More > > > importantly, the caller may assume errp be non-NULL when error happens, > > > and not setting the errp may crash QEMU. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu> > > --- > > > io/channel-socket.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/io/channel-socket.c b/io/channel-socket.c > > > index 53386b7..7bc308e 100644 > > > --- a/io/channel-socket.c > > > +++ b/io/channel-socket.c > > > @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ qio_channel_socket_accept(QIOChannelSocket *ioc, > > > if (errno == EINTR) { > > > goto retry; > > > } > > > +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Unable to accept connection"); > > > goto error; > > > > OK, but this code actually has a bigger problem as well: > > > > the original is: > > > > cioc->fd = qemu_accept(ioc->fd, (struct sockaddr *)>remoteAddr, > >>remoteAddrLen); > > if (cioc->fd < 0) { > > trace_qio_channel_socket_accept_fail(ioc); > > if (errno == EINTR) { > > goto retry; > > } > > goto error; > > } > > > > Stefan confirmed that trace_ doesn't preserve errno; so the if > > following it is wrong. It needs to preserve errno. > > Ah... If so, not sure whether we can do the reservation in trace codes > in general? > > For this one, I can just move the trace_*() below the errno check. > After all, if EINTR is got, it's not really a fail, so imho we should > not trace it with "accept fail". Agreed, we just need to move the trace below the if. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 03/29] io: fix qio_channel_socket_accept err handling
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:53:39PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote: > > When accept failed, we should setup errp with the reason. More > > importantly, the caller may assume errp be non-NULL when error happens, > > and not setting the errp may crash QEMU. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu> > --- > > io/channel-socket.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/io/channel-socket.c b/io/channel-socket.c > > index 53386b7..7bc308e 100644 > > --- a/io/channel-socket.c > > +++ b/io/channel-socket.c > > @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ qio_channel_socket_accept(QIOChannelSocket *ioc, > > if (errno == EINTR) { > > goto retry; > > } > > +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Unable to accept connection"); > > goto error; > > OK, but this code actually has a bigger problem as well: > > the original is: > > cioc->fd = qemu_accept(ioc->fd, (struct sockaddr *)>remoteAddr, >>remoteAddrLen); > if (cioc->fd < 0) { > trace_qio_channel_socket_accept_fail(ioc); > if (errno == EINTR) { > goto retry; > } > goto error; > } > > Stefan confirmed that trace_ doesn't preserve errno; so the if > following it is wrong. It needs to preserve errno. Ah... If so, not sure whether we can do the reservation in trace codes in general? For this one, I can just move the trace_*() below the errno check. After all, if EINTR is got, it's not really a fail, so imho we should not trace it with "accept fail". > > (Again this patch can go on it's own) Yes. For these patches, I intentionally put them at the beginning of the series (for easier picking up standalone). Do you (or Juan?) want me to repost these patches separately? -- Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 03/29] io: fix qio_channel_socket_accept err handling
* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote: > When accept failed, we should setup errp with the reason. More > importantly, the caller may assume errp be non-NULL when error happens, > and not setting the errp may crash QEMU. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu> --- > io/channel-socket.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/io/channel-socket.c b/io/channel-socket.c > index 53386b7..7bc308e 100644 > --- a/io/channel-socket.c > +++ b/io/channel-socket.c > @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ qio_channel_socket_accept(QIOChannelSocket *ioc, > if (errno == EINTR) { > goto retry; > } > +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Unable to accept connection"); > goto error; OK, but this code actually has a bigger problem as well: the original is: cioc->fd = qemu_accept(ioc->fd, (struct sockaddr *)>remoteAddr, >remoteAddrLen); if (cioc->fd < 0) { trace_qio_channel_socket_accept_fail(ioc); if (errno == EINTR) { goto retry; } goto error; } Stefan confirmed that trace_ doesn't preserve errno; so the if following it is wrong. It needs to preserve errno. (Again this patch can go on it's own) Dave > } > > -- > 2.7.4 > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
[Qemu-devel] [RFC 03/29] io: fix qio_channel_socket_accept err handling
When accept failed, we should setup errp with the reason. More importantly, the caller may assume errp be non-NULL when error happens, and not setting the errp may crash QEMU. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu--- io/channel-socket.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/io/channel-socket.c b/io/channel-socket.c index 53386b7..7bc308e 100644 --- a/io/channel-socket.c +++ b/io/channel-socket.c @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ qio_channel_socket_accept(QIOChannelSocket *ioc, if (errno == EINTR) { goto retry; } +error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Unable to accept connection"); goto error; } -- 2.7.4