On 25/02/2015 15:22, Max Reitz wrote:
3. nbd_co_discard()
quorum doens't call bdrv_co_discard(), so it is OK to return -EIO here.
That can change, so I think you should return -EIO either everywhere or
nowhere. Which probably means nowhere.
Hm, okay. How about adding an option to
On 2015-02-24 at 21:23, Wen Congyang wrote:
On 02/24/2015 05:31 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2015-02-11 at 22:07, Wen Congyang wrote:
The secondary qemu starts later than the primary qemu, so we
cannot connect to nbd server in bdrv_open().
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
On 02/24/2015 05:31 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2015-02-11 at 22:07, Wen Congyang wrote:
The secondary qemu starts later than the primary qemu, so we
cannot connect to nbd server in bdrv_open().
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang
On 2015-02-11 at 22:07, Wen Congyang wrote:
The secondary qemu starts later than the primary qemu, so we
cannot connect to nbd server in bdrv_open().
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Gonglei
The secondary qemu starts later than the primary qemu, so we
cannot connect to nbd server in bdrv_open().
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Gonglei arei.gong...@huawei.com
---
block/nbd.c | 100
