On 25/07/17 01:20, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 07/24/2017 08:00 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 24/07/17 14:02, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:13:19PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
This is very similar to the current ICS_SIMPLE model in XICS. We try
to reuse
On 07/24/2017 08:00 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 24/07/17 14:02, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:13:19PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> This is very similar to the current ICS_SIMPLE model in XICS. We try
>>> to reuse the ICS model because the sPAPR machine is tied to
On 07/24/2017 06:02 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:13:19PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> This is very similar to the current ICS_SIMPLE model in XICS. We try
>> to reuse the ICS model because the sPAPR machine is tied to the
>> XICSFabric interface and should be using a
On 24/07/17 14:02, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:13:19PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> This is very similar to the current ICS_SIMPLE model in XICS. We try
>> to reuse the ICS model because the sPAPR machine is tied to the
>> XICSFabric interface and should be using a common
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:13:19PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> This is very similar to the current ICS_SIMPLE model in XICS. We try
> to reuse the ICS model because the sPAPR machine is tied to the
> XICSFabric interface and should be using a common framework to switch
> from one controller
This is very similar to the current ICS_SIMPLE model in XICS. We try
to reuse the ICS model because the sPAPR machine is tied to the
XICSFabric interface and should be using a common framework to switch
from one controller model to another: XICS <-> XIVE.
The next patch will introduce the MMIO
