Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC kernel 0/2]A PV solution for KVM live migration optimization

2016-03-09 Thread Amit Shah
On (Thu) 10 Mar 2016 [12:31:32], Jitendra Kolhe wrote: > On 3/8/2016 4:44 PM, Amit Shah wrote: > Hi, > An interesting solution; I know a few different people have been > looking at > how to speed up ballooned VM migration. > > >>> > >>> Ooh, different solutions for the

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC kernel 0/2]A PV solution for KVM live migration optimization

2016-03-09 Thread Li, Liang Z
> On 3/8/2016 4:44 PM, Amit Shah wrote: > > On (Fri) 04 Mar 2016 [15:02:47], Jitendra Kolhe wrote: > > * Liang Li (liang.z...@intel.com) wrote: > > The current QEMU live migration implementation mark the all the > > guest's RAM pages as dirtied in the ram bulk stage, all these >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC kernel 0/2]A PV solution for KVM live migration optimization

2016-03-09 Thread Jitendra Kolhe
On 3/8/2016 4:44 PM, Amit Shah wrote: > On (Fri) 04 Mar 2016 [15:02:47], Jitendra Kolhe wrote: * Liang Li (liang.z...@intel.com) wrote: > The current QEMU live migration implementation mark the all the > guest's RAM pages as dirtied in the ram bulk stage, all these pages >

[Qemu-devel] [RFC kernel 0/2]A PV solution for KVM live migration optimization

2016-03-03 Thread Liang Li
The current QEMU live migration implementation mark the all the guest's RAM pages as dirtied in the ram bulk stage, all these pages will be processed and that takes quit a lot of CPU cycles. >From guest's point of view, it doesn't care about the content in free pages. We can make use of this fact