On 31/05/2015 08:11, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
+/* If not executing code then assume we are ok. */
+if (cpu-current_tb == NULL) {
+return true;
+}
+return cpu-can_do_io != 0;
For what it's worth, I think the if here is dead. Pavel?
Paolo
On 24/06/2015 13:40, Pavel Dovgaluk wrote:
+/* If not executing code then assume we are ok. */
+if (cpu-current_tb == NULL) {
+return true;
+}
+return cpu-can_do_io != 0;
For what it's worth, I think the if here is dead. Pavel?
cpu_can_do_io can be
From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
Bonzini
On 31/05/2015 08:11, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
+/* If not executing code then assume we are ok. */
+if (cpu-current_tb == NULL) {
+return true;
+}
+return cpu-can_do_io != 0;
From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
On 24/06/2015 13:40, Pavel Dovgaluk wrote:
+/* If not executing code then assume we are ok. */
+if (cpu-current_tb == NULL) {
+return true;
+}
+return cpu-can_do_io != 0;
For what it's worth, I
On 05/30/2015 11:11 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
This function has no architecture specific dependencies and should be
callable from core code. Move it to qom/cpu.h.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite crosthwaite.pe...@gmail.com
---
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net
r~
This function has no architecture specific dependencies and should be
callable from core code. Move it to qom/cpu.h.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite crosthwaite.pe...@gmail.com
---
include/exec/exec-all.h | 21 -
include/qom/cpu.h | 21 +
2 files
