Am 24.02.2018 um 00:51 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> We're about to add several new states, and booleans are becoming
> unwieldly and difficult to reason about. It would help to have a
> more explicit bookkeeping of the state of blockjobs. To this end,
> add a new "status" field and add our
On 02/23/2018 05:51 PM, John Snow wrote:
We're about to add several new states, and booleans are becoming
unwieldly and difficult to reason about. It would help to have a
more explicit bookkeeping of the state of blockjobs. To this end,
add a new "status" field and add our existing states in a
We're about to add several new states, and booleans are becoming
unwieldly and difficult to reason about. It would help to have a
more explicit bookkeeping of the state of blockjobs. To this end,
add a new "status" field and add our existing states in a redundant
manner alongside the bools they
