On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> With my Xen maintainer hat on: I wouldn't feel justified, personally,
>> in asking another project to continue supporting older versions. If
>> we didn't want to bump our own glib version, we would have to disable
>> "upstream" QEMU (as
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:50:49PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> > CC'ing xen-devel in case Xen maintainers have a need for something that
> > will that conflict with this proposal wrt supported build platforms.
>
> Thanks for the he
On 08/05/2018 16:50, George Dunlap wrote:
> Tailing into that, with my CentOS package maintainer hat on: You said
> that the code in question compiled on RHEL 6 because RH had backported
> the function in question. Will QEMU continue to actually compile on
> RHEL 6 / CentOS 6? I.e., will configur
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> CC'ing xen-devel in case Xen maintainers have a need for something that
> will that conflict with this proposal wrt supported build platforms.
Thanks for the heads-up. CC'ing some more people who usually have
opinions on this sort of t
