Re: [Qemu-devel] RE: [iGVT-g] VFIO based vGPU(was Re: [Announcement] 2015-Q3 release of XenGT - a Mediated ...)

2016-02-15 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Tian, Kevin > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:02 AM > > > > > Thanks for your summary, Kevin.  It does seem like there are only a few > > outstanding issues which should be manageable and hopefully the overall > > approach is cleaner for QEMU, management tools, and provides a more >

[Qemu-devel] RE: [iGVT-g] VFIO based vGPU(was Re: [Announcement] 2015-Q3 release of XenGT - a Mediated ...)

2016-02-03 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Zhiyuan Lv > Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 3:35 PM > > Hi Gerd/Alex, > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:44:55PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 14:10 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > >   Hi, > > > > > > > > Unfortunately it's not the only one. Another example is,

Re: [Qemu-devel] RE: [iGVT-g] VFIO based vGPU(was Re: [Announcement] 2015-Q3 release of XenGT - a Mediated ...)

2016-02-03 Thread Neo Jia
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:04:16AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > From: Zhiyuan Lv > > Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 3:35 PM > > > > Hi Gerd/Alex, > > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:44:55PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 14:10 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > >  

Re: [Qemu-devel] RE: [iGVT-g] VFIO based vGPU(was Re: [Announcement] 2015-Q3 release of XenGT - a Mediated ...)

2016-02-03 Thread Alex Williamson
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 08:04 +, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > From: Zhiyuan Lv > > Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 3:35 PM > >  > > Hi Gerd/Alex, > >  > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:44:55PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 14:10 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > >   Hi, > > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] RE: [iGVT-g] VFIO based vGPU(was Re: [Announcement] 2015-Q3 release of XenGT - a Mediated ...)

2016-02-03 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 4:45 AM > > > > First, Jike told me before his vacation, that we cannot do any change to > > KVM module according to community comments. Now I think it's not true. > > We can do necessary changes, as