Thomas Orgis wrote:
Sure, 32bit is vanishing from new hardware sales.
You can hardly buy a 32-bit AMD chip anymore and I wouldn't buy a 32-bit
Intel
chip when you can get a 64-bit AMD for the same price or less.
So for me, 32 bits are the state-of-the art, apart from my two machines
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 05:25:47PM +0200, Sunil Amitkumar Janki wrote:
About the Alphas, it would be great to run Tru64 on them or for the
occasional OpenVMS session. I'm looking forward to implementing an
Alpha target even though I've never seen or used them. You must be
very lucky to have
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 17:08 +0100, Stuart Brady wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 05:25:47PM +0200, Sunil Amitkumar Janki wrote:
About the Alphas, it would be great to run Tru64 on them or for the
occasional OpenVMS session. I'm looking forward to implementing an
Alpha target even though
On Saturday 24 March 2007 8:32 am, Sunil Amitkumar Janki wrote:
Anyhow, I expect 32-bit hardware to gradually die because of wear and
tear in the next few years and the replacement will be 64-bit hardware so
the problem will solve itself that way.
Specifically, in 2008 32-bit x86 hardware
Am Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:55:16 +
schrieb Julian Seward [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The problems of the gcc backend to qemu have already been discussed
extensively on this list. Stealing 3+ registers from gcc on x86 really
is asking for trouble, and I believe it is generally understood that the
Thomas Orgis wrote:
Am Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:45:49 +
schrieb Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do not understand enough of QEMU yet, but I have checked out CVS and
am reading through its source. When I understand more I hope we can fix
this long-standing annoyance.
This is GCC
As far as X86 is concerned i386/i486/i586 are very different from later
generation
processors. I am wondering whether another host and target architecture
could be
created called i686 that makes use of something like MMX or other
registers in Intel
Pentium II/III/4 and AMD Athlon to negate
Am Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:13:00 +0100
schrieb Sunil Amitkumar Janki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have seen this error as well when building with i686/pentium3/athlon
optimisations. As I am doing a course on x86 assembly programming
at the moment I can tell you that it suffers from register starvation
Am Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:45:49 +
schrieb Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do not understand enough of QEMU yet, but I have checked out CVS and
am reading through its source. When I understand more I hope we can fix
this long-standing annoyance.
This is GCC PR16185
Am Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:18:40 +
schrieb Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The first part is true, the second is not, in that I already upgraded
to the 686 kernel, so the qemu build on FC6 is not fixed by installing the
686 kernel.
So, do we have any other clue about this?
Some qemu coder
Thomas Orgis wrote:
Am Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:18:40 +
schrieb Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The first part is true, the second is not, in that I already upgraded
to the 686 kernel, so the qemu build on FC6 is not fixed by installing the 686
kernel.
So, do we have any other clue
11 matches
Mail list logo
