Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] Linux KDE vs. Windows
Am 24.07.2007 um 15:32 schrieb Clemens Kolbitsch: i'm emulating i386 (what else when using windows *g*) [...] just in case someone knows :-) As far as I recall, in chronological order: alpha, ia64, amd64. ;-) ok.. ok ... my fault ;-)
[Qemu-devel] Linux KDE vs. Windows
hi! i've got a questions... just out of curiosity: when emulating windows xp, i get quite good speeds. however, when running linux, i can only work with it when turning off kde... it is WAY too slow. is there a known reason for that / does anyone know what i could be doing wrong? i'm emulating i386 (what else when using windows *g*) on a i386 using kqemu, newest version of qemu... just in case someone knows :-) greets, Clemens
Re: [Qemu-devel] Linux KDE vs. Windows
allocate more ram to your qemu guest it's the -m switch. Default is 128M, way too low for KDE. Try first 192, 256, and then 512 if you can afford it. On 7/24/07, Clemens Kolbitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi! i've got a questions... just out of curiosity: when emulating windows xp, i get quite good speeds. however, when running linux, i can only work with it when turning off kde... it is WAY too slow. is there a known reason for that / does anyone know what i could be doing wrong? i'm emulating i386 (what else when using windows *g*) on a i386 using kqemu, newest version of qemu... just in case someone knows :-) greets, Clemens -- Christian -- http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/, a linux distribution for Qemu
Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] Linux KDE vs. Windows
hi christian, thanks for the reply... looks like a good explanation *gg* ... why didn't i try that before posting (haven't done it yet, but looks reasonable :-) )?? greets! allocate more ram to your qemu guest it's the -m switch. Default is 128M, way too low for KDE. Try first 192, 256, and then 512 if you can afford it. On 7/24/07, Clemens Kolbitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi! i've got a questions... just out of curiosity: when emulating windows xp, i get quite good speeds. however, when running linux, i can only work with it when turning off kde... it is WAY too slow. is there a known reason for that / does anyone know what i could be doing wrong? i'm emulating i386 (what else when using windows *g*) on a i386 using kqemu, newest version of qemu... just in case someone knows :-) greets, Clemens
Re: [Qemu-devel] Linux KDE vs. Windows
Am 24.07.2007 um 15:32 schrieb Clemens Kolbitsch: i'm emulating i386 (what else when using windows *g*) [...] just in case someone knows :-) As far as I recall, in chronological order: alpha, ia64, amd64. ;-) Andreas
Re: [Qemu-devel] Linux KDE vs. Windows
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:30:11PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 24.07.2007 um 15:32 schrieb Clemens Kolbitsch: i'm emulating i386 (what else when using windows *g*) [...] just in case someone knows :-) As far as I recall, in chronological order: alpha, ia64, amd64. ;-) What about mips and ppc, then? ;-) (And if you count wince, there's also arm and sh...) -- Stuart Brady
