On 10/26/2018 10:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 04:03:51PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> This is from my (imperfect) notes, corrections welcome.
>>
>> Motivation: QEMU contains stuff of dubious value, which gets in the way
>> in various (sometimes painful and
> On 26 Oct 2018, at 16:03, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> This is from my (imperfect) notes, corrections welcome.
>
> Motivation: QEMU contains stuff of dubious value, which gets in the way
> in various (sometimes painful and expensive) ways.
>
> Deprecation is the marking of an external
On 28 October 2018 at 05:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>> Something I meant to bring up but forgot is about the classification
>> of devices, especially with a view towards security. It is not directly
>> about deprecation, but it is somewhat related as it is related
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 04:03:51PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> This is from my (imperfect) notes, corrections welcome.
>>
>> Motivation: QEMU contains stuff of dubious value, which gets in the way
>> in various (sometimes painful and expensive) ways.
>>
>>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 04:03:51PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> This is from my (imperfect) notes, corrections welcome.
>
> Motivation: QEMU contains stuff of dubious value, which gets in the way
> in various (sometimes painful and expensive) ways.
>
> Deprecation is the marking of an
This is from my (imperfect) notes, corrections welcome.
Motivation: QEMU contains stuff of dubious value, which gets in the way
in various (sometimes painful and expensive) ways.
Deprecation is the marking of an external interface as "we intend to
remove this, you should stop using it"
